subscribe to our newsletter

LRBAs still facing ‘two-pronged attack’

Miranda Brownlee
19 June 2017 — 1 minute read

With one of the government’s amendments for LRBAs now passed, technical experts have warned that the government may still proceed with the other intended amendment, once industry consultation has been completed.

Last week, the government passed an amendment to include repayments of borrowings under a limited recourse borrowing arrangement in the transfer balance cap as part of the Treasury Laws Amendment (2017 Measures No. 2) Bill 2017.

Perpetual head of strategic advice Colin Lewis noted that this “was only one limb of the two-pronged attack on LRBAs”, and the other measure to include the outstanding balance of an LRBA loan towards a member’s total superannuation balance was not included in this bill.


“The other [amendment] is still subject to industry consultation and we still haven’t got any certainty on that,” Mr Lewis said.

If this amendment to count the debt towards the total balance does proceed, it may preclude some SMSF trustees from making further non-concessional contributions, he explained.

“And if you can’t do that, how do you pay off the debt?” he asked.

SMSF Association head of technical Peter Hogan said without the ability to make non-concessional contributions, it could be almost impossible to finance an arrangement.

“The banks are reluctant to lend in this space now anyway. It’s really difficult to actually find a bank that will lend money for a residential loan because of those changes in the funding requirements,” Mr Hogan said.

“So if you take away the ability to make non-concessional contributions, you almost close this market down.”

Mr Hogan said Treasury has stated that it is not their intention to close down gearing inside super by default by making it impossible.

“That is why the legislation that was introduced had nothing about total super balance in it, it’s not because there won’t be unfortunately. If you were thinking there are no amendments to total super balance, they must have decided to ditch it altogether; then I’m sorry to say that’s not the case. It suggests they’re still thinking about it,” he said.

“They will and do plan to reintroduce additional legislation in relation to total super balance. We’re not entirely sure when. All we know at this stage is that they’re still thinking about it as to what approach they might take.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

LRBAs still facing ‘two-pronged attack’
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.