subscribe to our newsletter

Major concerns flagged with super balance records

flagged 382
Miranda Brownlee
25 May 2017 — 1 minute read

With the SMSF industry likely to commence events-based reporting later than APRA-regulated super funds, one technical expert has warned there could be major discrepancies in the ATO’s records.

Colonial First State executive manager Craig Day says the ATO is working with the SMSF industry to determine when events-based reporting will commence for SMSFs, as well as its frequency.

“I think the SMSF industry would like to delay the reporting frequency as much as possible, while the ATO wants it as frequently as possible. Obviously, they’ll meet somewhere in-between, but we don’t know what that’ll be,” Mr Day said at an event in Sydney.


The ATO previously told SMSF Adviser that it was working with the sector to put in place transitional arrangements for the 2017-18 year with a view to move to events-based reporting by 2018/19.

Mr Day said given that the larger APRA-regulated funds will be adhering to different reporting requirements to the SMSF sector, this will create problems for SMSF practitioners in relation to clients who have both SMSFs and large super funds.

“If you’ve got clients with both SMSFs and large funds or they’re moving between those two different worlds, that reporting will all be wrong for a period of time until things wash out the system,” he said.

SMSF practitioners will need to be able to identify where an incorrect figure has arisen because the client rolled out of an SMSF, for example, and haven’t reported it yet but started a pension in a large super fund that has been reported, Mr Day said.

“They’ll end up a credit without the debit coming through. That’s the world we’re going to live in,” he said.

Mr Day also noted that while the ATO has initiated a new service on the myGov portal which gives individuals their total super balance, for clients with an SMSF, this figure will be wrong on 30 June this year, as the SMSF won’t be reporting until around six months later.

“You’re going to have to look at that and make additional inquiries to confirm that is the actual valuation,” he said.

While the additional reporting requirements with these new rules won’t be a major problem for clients in large super funds, for SMSF clients, practitioners will want to make sure the client using an administration service that can facilitate that reporting.

“I keep on saying the days of the admin service run off the back of an Excel spreadsheet is not going to work anymore. There’s going to be much more frequent reporting services required and ongoing reporting,” Mr Day concluded.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Major concerns flagged with super balance records
flagged 382
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.