Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Advertisement

Highlights

Taxing large super balances at an even higher rate than the proposed $3 million super tax – but only when a gain is realised – is a more equitable solution to reducing ...

The starting point for determining the actuarial percentage to be used when winding up an SMSF is often the percentage ...

With investment in robotics surging and China emerging as a global AI powerhouse, the smart money is flowing into the ...

SMSF trustees may start “shopping around” to get the best market valuation for assets with Division 296 tax on the ...

VIEW ALL
SMSF Adviser Podcast
The increase of the transfer balance cap from $1.9 million to $2 million is not as simple to understand as it seems. In this SMSF Adviser ...
Review nine smart ways to invest using an SMSF, from property and international shares to cryptocurrency and managed funds. Maximise your ...
With the floodgates of spot Bitcoin ETFs now open, it's plausible that the new crypto bull market has commenced.
India’s financial year 2023-24 has ended and it has been one of the best years for the Indian stock market with a significant number of ...
SMSF Adviser sits down with Stephen Jewell, co-founder and managing director of Australian Money Market, to discuss the firm’s origins and ...
A step-by-step guide to adding Bitcoin to your SMSF portfolio with Digital Surge, including guidance on fees, the recurring buy feature and ...
Self-Managed Super Funds (SMSFs) have long been a preferred choice for astute investors seeking greater control and flexibility over their ...
Experience National Conference Workshops; interactive sessions that foster engagement and offer a practical learning environment driven by ...
With cross-disciplinary collaboration more essential than ever, the SMSF Association is excited to bring together top industry minds at its ...
There are a few processes that need expert guidance. Upon providing specialist support, accounting and tax reporting works effectively.
BGL invites you to witness the future of document management at the live premiere of BGL SmartDocs 360.
Explore why SMSF trustees should consider bullion in this free webcast. Join us for an insightful, free live webcast as we delve into the ...
On the eve of the release of the 2024 Class Annual Benchmark Report, Class CEO Tim Steele reviews some of the dynamics that have shaped the ...
Explore why SMSF trustees should consider bullion in this free webcast. Join us for an insightful, free live webcast as we delve into the role that gold, silver, and platinum bullion can play in an ...

Subscribe to the

smsf logo standard

BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Subscribe

Wilson pushes progressive surcharge alternative to Div 296

news
By Keith Ford
July 29 2025
2 minute read
geoff wilson wilson asset management smsfa n3hbdc
expand image

Taxing large super balances at an even higher rate than the proposed $3 million super tax – but only when a gain is realised – is a more equitable solution to reducing concessions on large balances, according to the fund management chair.

Wilson Asset Management chairman Geoff Wilson has spent seemingly every moment since Labor won the federal election in May shouting out the faults in Division 296.

Now, in a submission to the Economic Reform Roundtable, Wilson Asset Management has delivered its own alternative to the additional 15 per cent tax on all earnings attributable to balances above $3 million.

 
 

Called the Progressive Super Surcharge and Tax Offset, WAM’s alternative also kicks in for balances above $3 million, however it would only apply to realised gains and raise $2.433 billion in revenue.

“Despite requiring Senate approval, the proposed tax on unrealised gains has already prompted a rush to liquidate assets ahead of the 30 June 2026 implementation date,” the submission said.

“Australia is proving to be no different than Norway, Spain and Sweden, where taxing unrealised gains led to capital exodus and therefore lower than expected tax revenue.

“The Progressive Super Surcharge will tax superannuation more equitably, while the Tax Offset will cover the administrative and technology costs involved in implementing systems capable of accurately calculating and reporting realised gains.”

Essentially, the plan would apply a tax on realised gains applicable to the portion of any superannuation balance above $3 million, increasing alongside the size of the total super balance.

“The outcome of the proposal would allow the government to increase tax revenue from high balance accounts without breaching the realisation principle of the tax act,” WAM said.

The proposed additional taxes for the Progressive Super Surcharge are:

  • Balances of $3 million - $6 million: an additional 15 per cent tax on realised gains.
  • Balances of $6 million - $10 million: an additional 17.5 per cent tax on realised gains.
  • Balances of $10 million - $20 million: an additional 20 per cent tax on realised gains.
  • Balances more than $20 million: an additional 25 per cent tax on realised gains.

“Our proposal includes a complementary Tax Offset, to compensate for the administration and system upgrade costs required by Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) regulated superannuation funds claimed at the individual level.

“Importantly, under the Progressive Super Surcharge and Tax Offset, no change is proposed for the first $3 million of any Australian's superannuation account. The tax would only be triggered upon the sale of an asset for a profit, with interest and dividend income being included.

“The Progressive Super Surcharge and Tax Offset maintains the social contract with all Australians. It guarantees the provision of trillions of dollars of patient long-term capital to support start-ups and small- to mid-size enterprises which are vital for increasing productivity. It will also make our society more equitable, with the tax burden to be borne by those with larger superannuation balances.”

The tax offset, WAM explained, would cover the cost of the one-off system upgrade and ongoing costs required to calculate realised gains, with the calculation built on the costs assumed within the Div 296 bill’s explanatory memorandum.

“The ongoing administration of the Tax Offset is provided to superannuants when completing their annual tax return. This ensures that the super system, not everyday taxpayers, funds the compliance build and ongoing costs,” the submission said.

WAM added: “This proposal will modernise the superannuation system and raise more revenue than is projected under the proposed Division 296. Yet, unlike Division 296, it will not discourage investment, as our prior research found a $94.5 billion deadweight loss could be created if the taxation of unrealised gains proceeds.”

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!