Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
subscribe to our newsletter

Penalties on SMSF trustees to increase substantially, so time to change to a corporate trustee

By Daniel Butler, Director, DBA Lawyers
11 July 2023 — 3 minute read

With the penalty unit increasing from $275 to $313 from 1 July 2023, SMSFs need to be extremely careful as this results in most administrative penalties increasing from $16,500 (i.e., 60 penalty units x $275) to $18,780 (i.e., 60 penalty units x $313).

This article discusses administrative penalties under s 166 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (Cth) (SISA) and provides ways to minimise this risk. In particular, a sole purpose corporate trustee is strongly recommended.

Administrative penalties

The ATO can impose numerous penalties under s 166 of SISA, including the following:

Advertisement
Advertisement
  • S 65(1): generally, no lending to members or relatives: 60 penalty units
  • S 67(1): generally, no borrowing: 60 penalty units
  • S 84(1): must comply with in-house asset rules: 60 penalty units
  • S 103(1): must keep minutes: 10 penalty units
  • S 104(1): must keep records of changes of trustee: 10 penalty units

Administrative penalties are imposed on the trustees/directors of an SMSF personally and should not be paid by an SMSF.

It is interesting to note that the penalty unit has increased by 74 per cent since 1 July 2017 as summarised below.

Penalty unit - increases since mid-2017

Date

Penalty unit

Increase

Increase from 1-7-2017 penalty

1/07/2023

313

14%

74%

1/01/2023

275

24%

53%

1/07/2020

222

6%

23%

1/07/2017

210

17%

30/06/2017

180

Change to a corporate trustee or pay the cost

It is definitely a good time to move away from individual trustees and move to a corporate trustee as soon as possible. SMSFs that have individual trustees are subject to hefty penalties; such penalties multiply as the number of individual trustees increase. The table below shows the substantial savings that come with having a company act as an SMSF trustee given the number of individual trustees that can be involved (noting that some jurisdictions impose a maximum of four individual trustees):

No of individual trustees

A 60 x Penalty unit offence

Total penalty

Corporate trustee

Saving with company

$

$

$

$

2

18,780

37560

18,780

18,780

See note below

3

18,780

56340

18,780

37,560

4

18,780

75120

18,780

56,340

5

18,780

93900

18,780

75,120

6

18,780

112680

18,780

93,900

Note, an SMSF should have a minimum of two individual trustees.

Don’t funds that get penalised deserve it, anyway?

For many SMSF trustees/directors even though they never intend or plan to contravene, one day human error may result in a penalty being imposed, e.g., making an unauthorised withdrawal or not immediately reimbursing an expense paid on behalf of a fund.

As the old saying goes, to err (or make errors) is to be human. To add to this, SMSF auditors are far more active in reporting ACRs, especially given the ATO’s increased review of SMSF auditors.

With the substantial increase in the penalty of 74 per cent in six years, query whether the penalties should be reviewed especially, as prior to any remission, some administrative penalties can start off at hundreds of thousands of dollars.

Can advisers be liable?

Given that advisers may be implicated in contraventions, especially if they give incorrect advice, advisers should be proactive in assisting clients move to a corporate trustee. Advisers can inform clients of the increased risks and how easy it is to be ‘pinged’, especially if the fund has individual trustees. Some clients may also argue that an adviser who has not been proactive in recommending a corporate trustee should pay the additional penalty.

Does one or multiple penalties get imposed?

ATO records confirm that contraventions generally occur in multiplies rather than as one off events as there were, for instance, around 3 auditor contravention reports (ACRs) for each SMSF for FY2022 with a total of around 40,000 ACRs for of the 13,558 (i.e., around 2.95 per fund). Thus, assuming there were three separate breaches per SMSF, the amount saved with a corporate trustee would be as follows:

No of individual trustees

A 3 x 60 x Penalty unit offence

Total penalty

Corporate trustee

Saving with company

2

56,340

112680

18,780

93,900

See note below

3

56,340

169020

18,780

150,240

4

56,340

225360

18,780

206,580

5

56,340

281700

18,780

262,920

6

56,340

338040

18,780

319,260

Note:

- An SMSF should have minimum of two individual trustees.

- Some jurisdictions also impose a maximum of 4 individual trustees.

Conclusions

The above highlights a compelling reason for every SMSF to have a corporate trustee. SMSFs with individual trustees should make the move as soon as practicable or suffer the consequences.

SMSF trustees/directors should obtain expert advice before implementing any significant transaction if there is any doubt. Further, if there is a contravention, timely action must be taken to minimise any adverse impact.

Advisers need to be proactive in notifying clients with individual trustees to show they care and minimise risk.

DBA Lawyers has assisted SMSFs in seeking a full or partial remission of penalties. We also regularly assist SMSFs in relation to the ATO’s early engagement and voluntary disclosure service (click here for our article on this topic).

* * *

This article is for general information only and should not be relied upon without first seeking advice from an appropriately qualified professional.

Penalties on SMSF trustees to increase substantially, so time to change to a corporate trustee
danielbutler px smsf
smsfadviser logo
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

Comments powered by CComment

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning