Determining whether an amount paid to an SMSF member is a loan or access to benefits without a condition of release often depends on what the initial intention was.
While working for the SMSF regulator, the question would often arise as to whether an amount paid to a member of an SMSF was a loan or access to benefits without meeting a condition of release. Often, the hardest issue would be to find out the intention at the time the money was accessed. Was there an intention to repay the money?
Subsection 65(1) of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 (SIS Act) prohibits trustees from lending money and giving financial assistance to members or their relatives.
Subsection 10(1) of the SIS Act defines the word ‘loan’ as including, “the provision of credit or any other form of financial accommodation, whether or not enforceable or intended to be enforceable, by legal proceedings”.
As this definition is inclusive, a loan can be any or all of the following:
- A loan according to the general or legal usage of the term;
- The provision of credit; and/or
- Any other form of financial accommodation.
The word loan is defined in the Macquarie Dictionary as:
- The act of lending, a grant of the use of something temporarily: the loan of a book.
- Something lent or furnished on condition of being returned, especially a sum of money lent at interest.
The definitions above point to a loan involving something being given temporarily with the intention that it will be returned. Other indicators include a loan agreement, the charging of interest and commencement of repayments from the member to the fund. Also, note that under the new penalty regime, failure to comply with section 65 of the SIS Act could result in a possible charge of $10,200 per trustee. Where a loan cannot be substantiated, the money paid could be deemed to be access of the member’s benefits.
When a benefit can be accessed
The payment standards are prescribed in Part 6 of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Regulations 1994 (SIS Regulations) and the conditions of release are set out in Schedule 1 of the SIS Regulations.
SIS Regulations subparagraph 6.17(2)(a)(i) states that a member’s benefits in a fund may be paid by being cashed in accordance with Division 6.3.
SIS Sub-regulation 6.18(1) states that a member’s preserved benefits in a regulated superannuation fund may be cashed on or after the satisfaction by the member of a condition of release.
SIS Subregulation 6.01(2) defines a condition of release to mean a condition of release specified in Column 2 of Schedule 1 and, subject to regulation 6.01B, a member of a fund is taken to have satisfied a condition of release if the event specified in that condition has occurred in relation to the member.
The conditions of release listed in Schedule 1, Part 1: Regulated superannuation funds include, but are not limited to:
- Terminal medical condition;
- Permanent incapacity;
- Temporary resident permanently departing Australia;
- Termination of gainful employment with a standard employer sponsor of the regulated superannuation fund on or after 1 July 1997, where the member’s preserved benefits in the fund at the time of the termination are less than $200;
- Severe financial hardship;
- Attaining age 65;
- Compassionate grounds;
- Termination of gainful employment with an employer, or associates, who had at any time contributed to the regulated superannuation fund in relation to the member;
- Temporary incapacity; and
- Attainment of preservation age.
Where the member has not met any of the conditions of release shown above, the member will be assessed as having accessed benefits without meeting a condition of release. Therefore, the amount paid to the member will be assessed as part of their normal assessable income.
Note that this regulation falls under the operating standards of the SIS Act and is, therefore, subject to the new penalty regime imposed by the ATO from 30 June 2014. This holds a possible charge of $3,400 per trustee so it is important to follow the requirements set out above.
Heath Griffiths, director, Quay SMSF
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 08:20Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 08:00Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 08:00Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- 17 Aug 2017Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 17 Aug 2017Qld succession law changes tipped to impact SMSFsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 16 Aug 2017Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tierBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilities
A lack of understanding around taxable and non-taxable components in super funds could be exposing SMSF clients to unnecessary tax liabiliti...read more
- Contributions triple in June quarter, survey shows
The average contribution amount from SMSF trustees tripled for the June 2017 quarter, with super members looking to maximise their contribut...read more
- Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reporting
With events-based reporting set to generate huge amounts of data, concerns have been raised about whether the ATO’s systems will be able t...read more
- view all