SMSFs’ heavy allocation in Australian equities continues to place them at risk of missing out on growth opportunities in the future. How can practitioners help trustees adjust their portfolios?
The ATO website has updated information on the actual investment strategies of SMSFs as at June 2015.
The allocation of investments within SMSFs can be seen in the chart below sourced from the ATO website.
Asset allocation of SMSFs as at June 2015
What stands out to us is what would seem like a parochial bias towards Australia, and in particular the Australian share market with 31 per cent allocation, and further exposure to Australian shares probably via listed and unlisted trusts and other managed investments. We will spare readers the lecture that the ASX is dominated by banks and resources companies, offering reduced diversification and potential sources of earnings growth to investors.
This is intriguing when compared to the composition of Australia’s Future Fund that was created many years ago by Peter Costello. Less than a quarter of the Future Fund’s exposure to share markets is held in Australian shares.
The table below outlines the current investment strategy of the Future Fund which in some respects is similar in purpose to SMSFs in that it is to provide for long-term obligations.
A recent research piece from JP Morgan, focusing on expected returns in the decade ahead (light green) versus returns of the past decade (dark green), supports the allocation of the Future Fund.
The challenge for SMSF practitioners is getting their clients to adjust their investment strategy towards generating returns in the future rather than simply extrapolating the past.
Accounting firm PwC recently completed a study that was projecting future economic contribution from the top countries in the world between now and 2050. Australia, currently ranked 19th in economic output, is projected to slip to 28th by 2050.
With Bangladesh, Pakistan, the Philippines, Nigeria and Vietnam projected to overtake Australia in terms of economic contribution, we question the historic wisdom of trustees in allocating the majority of their portfolio to ‘blue chip’ Australian shares.
We can only hope that Bangladesh is not forecast to overtake us in test cricket in the years ahead, but that did not form part of PwC’s study.
SMSF practitioners should encourage their SMSF trustees to consider a global perspective in forming their investment strategy to reduce the risks of putting too many eggs into one geographic region.
Mark Draper, adviser, GEM Capital Financial Advice
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 23 Aug 2017'No apparent benefit' in ATO positionBy Katarina Taurian
- 23 Aug 2017Transfer balance cap confusion posing risks for practitionersBy Miranda Brownlee
- 23 Aug 2017TBAR reporting tipped to expose illegal adviceBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Aug 2017Contentious views on segregation locked inBy Katarina Taurian
- 22 Aug 2017Contributions spike for 2016-17 financial yearBy Staff Reporter
- 22 Aug 2017ATO targeting illegal retirement schemesBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Transfer balance cap confusion posing risks for practitioners
Confusion around certain aspects of the transfer balance cap could be leading some practitioners to provide advice to clients based on premi...read more
- view all