The introduction of the super reforms has added a level of complexity to the system not seen since the end of reasonable benefit limits. SMSF practitioners need to be across what planning opportunities there are for clients.
Whether we like them or not, it’s nice to finally have some decisiveness around the government’s changes to superannuation.
Unfortunately, it appears the days of ‘simple super’ are gone. The introduction of the $1.6 million cap for tax free superannuation pension streams has added a layer of complexity back into superannuation not seen since the abolition of reasonable benefit limits (RBL) in 2007.
From 1 July 2017, we can expect some major changes.
- $1.6 million cap on retirement income streams
This cap includes income streams that are account-based, defined benefit, deferred or paid as reversionary income streams. If a person’s transfer balance exceeds the relevant cap, they will need to withdraw the excess amount as a superannuation lump sum, or roll it back to the accumulation phase of superannuation.
If it is the first offence, the tax rate is 15 per cent. If your client has previously exceeded the cap and has offended again, the tax rate is 30 per cent.
Balances over and above the $1.6 million transfer limit will essentially be treated as accumulation balances and earnings will be taxed at 15 per cent.
Those with $1.6 million or more invested in super from 1 July will not be eligible to make further after-tax contributions, but will still be permitted to make pre-tax contributions up to the relevant annual cap.
If a person exceeds the $1.6 million cap inside of super, rather than leaving the excess in super where earnings are taxed at 15 per cent, if they have no other taxable income personally, you may consider transferring the excess balance out of superannuation and advise them on investing it personally. A person of age pension age can earn approximately $30,000 per annum and avoid paying income tax.
Assuming an earning rate of five per cent per annum, an individual could invest $600,000 personally and potentially not pay personal tax. Therefore, a couple could invest $1.2 million in joint names earning five per cent per annum and all but avoid paying tax.
If your client is fortunate enough to already have personal assets earning taxable income, then leaving their assets in super is likely to be the best option. Accumulation balances in super attract maximum tax of 15 per cent, which is likely to be a better tax outcome than investing the money outside of superannuation.
If your client is a couple where one spouse has a balance in excess of $1.6 million (which is unrestricted/non-preserved) and the spouse with the lower balance is under 65 years of age, it may be possible to arrange for the higher superannuated spouse to withdraw a lump sum from their balance and re-contribute it as a tax-free contribution for their spouse. This could either reduce the higher balance to below $1.6 million, or at least reduce the excess.
Please note, available contributions caps and eligibility to withdraw and contribute must be observed.
Consider delaying/reducing pension establishment
The pension cap is due to index in $100,000 increments per annum in line with the consumer price index. However, for clients wanting to start a pension using only a percentage of the full $1.6 million entitlement, they will only be eligible to receive the same percentage of any increase.
John commences a pension with an account balance of $800,000 in FY2017-18. At that time, he has used 50 per cent of his $1.6 million personal transfer balance cap.
If the general transfer balance cap is indexed to $1.7 million in 2019-20, John’s personal transfer balance cap is increased by $50,000 because he is only eligible to take 50 per cent of the $100,000 increase. Accordingly, John can now commence a pension with capital of $850,000 without breaching his personal transfer balance cap.
The opportunity here may not relate specifically to pensions being established from 1 July 2017, but more so to clients considering a pension establishment when/if indexation is due.
If a SMSF trustee has more than $1.6 million invested in superannuation and can make use of any future indexation, it may be wise to advise them to delay starting the pension until indexation has been introduced.
- Reduction to contribution limits
From 1 July 2017, the new contribution limit will become $100,000 per annum, or $300,000 over three years. The existing contribution test still applies. That is, individuals over 65 years of age who can satisfy the employment test (40 hours in a 30 day period), can still make tax free contributions to superannuation, but may not utilise the bring forward rule.
Use existing contribution caps while they last
If your client has the means, I strongly recommend that you consider advising them to make a lump sum tax free contribution of up to $540,000 prior to 30 June 2017, before the tax-free limit reduces to $300,000 on 1 July. For couples under the age of 65, they could potentially contribute $1,080,000 to superannuation, as opposed to $600,000 from 1 July, which is a substantial difference.
If they are planning to sell an asset and contribute the proceeds to super, ensure appropriate timing so that funds clear in time to make the contribution prior to 30 June 2017 to benefit from the existing limits.
Otherwise, you may consider borrowing some funds to boost the super balance. This is not without serious considerations, mainly around the certainty of funds becoming available and prevailing interest rates. Never the less, it may make sense.
- Reduction in concessional contribution limit
The annual cap on concessional before-tax superannuation contributions will be reduced to $25,000. Furthermore, the threshold at which high income earners pay additional contributions tax (Division 293) will be lowered from $300,000 to $250,000.
The options for trustees are limited here, however, where possible, individuals currently salary sacrificing above their employer’s 9.5 per cent super guarantee should consider maximising their pre-tax contribution (if they not already).
Andrew Hewison, managing director, Hewison Private Wealth
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 21 Aug 2016Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Aug 2016Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all