There are a few priorities on my superannuation wish list in 2015 that will serve to benefit our retirement system, but it concerns me greatly that further changes could occur without a clear line of sight about what the system should look like in the long term.
The question was recently put to me asking what my wish list was for superannuation in 2015. Specifically, the person wanted to know which one (or two) priorities were on my policy radar. Good question.
The Cooper Review in 2010 set the way for significant change in the superannuation industry and this is certainly what has occupied copious amounts of times both for me and for other industry stakeholders. Advocating, negotiating and consulting on the necessary legislation and then implementing the many changes were a high priority for many years.
Even with the current government’s 'hands-off' superannuation commitment, there has still been plenty of work to do, including reviews of the governance of super, the Financial System Inquiry (FSI), Budget submissions, working with regulators etc. To be clear, I do not question the validity or necessity of this work in this stage of the super industry’s evolution.
Throughout much of the processes in recent years, however, there has been little commitment or work done to create a set of objectives for our retirement income system.
This is what I see as a priority for myself this year – to encourage, promote and advocate for the development of a long-term set of objectives for our retirement incomes system (only objectives for superannuation were suggested in the FSI report).
It concerns me greatly that further changes will occur without any clear line of sight about what we want and need the system to look like in the long term. We know that constant tinkering has significantly undermined the confidence of many Australians in the super system.
How do we want our super system to interact with the aged pension? Do we accept heavy reliance on the aged pension, or in 50 years' time, do we want most Australians to be largely self-reliant in their retirement?
When the objectives are clear, it will become much easier to assess the merit of further change against this. Without a clear set of objectives, how do we know we are heading in the right direction?
Have I got it right or do you think my focus should be elsewhere? Have your say below.
Liz Westover, head of superannuation, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 21 Aug 2016Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Aug 2016Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all