You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

New data debunks trustee stereotypes

strategy
By George Lucas
November 26 2013
2 minute read
8 View Comments

How often is it said that many SMSF trustees simply don’t have the market smarts to handle their investment portfolios?

Before the GFC, they were too heavy in equities; after the GFC, they held too much cash – until the market rally in 2009 provided a classical example of a dead cat bounce. Now they are supposed to be listening to the siren call of the retail property markets spruikers. As for international shares, they are simply off the radar.

Well, don’t believe all you hear or read. A survey we have conducted of financial advisers has found their clients (mostly SMSF trustees) have a strong interest in overseas shares. It’s not to suggest they are going to jump into this market with their ears pinned back, but it does say they are definitely cognisant of what overseas markets have to offer.

 
 

First, the results: of those polled, only 11 per cent of advisers reported that their clients had no interest in overseas markets, with the vast majority – 89 per cent – saying their clients are considering investing. Breaking this 89 per cent down further, 55 per cent are going down the ETF route, 22 per cent via a managed fund and 11 per cent directly.

At the very least, these numbers refute the proposition that SMSF trustees have no interest in overseas equities; quite the opposite. But it has taken quite some time since the GFC for them to put their toe back into international waters – and who could blame them? In doing this they are shadowing the big end of town that has also been increasing its exposure to this asset class.

There are several factors behind this increased interest in overseas markets, all of which demonstrate a degree of sophistication that might surprise the institutional heavyweights.

It reflects a belief that the Australian dollar, currently trading around 93 US cents, remains overvalued. Certainly at 93 cents it remains well above its historical average since it was floated in late 1983. A survey of advisers two months ago showed the majority expected the Australian dollar to be below 95 cents by year end – with 41 per cent thinking it would be below 85 cents

Going hand in glove is a growing appreciation by advisers and their clients of how currency movements pose an additional risk to an overseas share portfolio. While some managed funds and ETFs do hedge the currency, the majority are unhedged, leaving the trustee doubly exposed to currency and market risk. Obviously the same risk occurs for those who chose to invest directly.

It also reflects an appreciation that it’s important to balance a portfolio (only having cash and fully franked Australian blue chips has its obvious shortcomings) and investing in global companies with strong market access (especially to Asia) is a smart way to diversify.

The emergence of the ETF market, too, has played its role. They are easy to get in and out off and can come with lower fees than a managed fund.

So where are the trustees looking to place their hard-earned? Despite the fact many advisers believe the US market to be fully priced, and despite the mixed economic and business signals emanating from the world’s largest economy, there is still demand for US stocks.

But somewhat surprisingly, it is European stocks that appear to be getting the most attention. Much of this is due to the “valuation arbitrage” where global companies are trading at lower PEs than US companies in similar businesses simply because they are listed on US exchanges.

Emerging markets aren’t on the horizon, but that’s understandable due to the prolonged underperformance of these markets. There are complexities in these markets that even challenge the resources of large institutions.

The survey doesn’t suggest this is the equity equivalent of the California gold rush. It would be worrying if it did. But it is evidence that advisers and trustees are far more sophisticated investors than they are often given credit for. When you consider it’s their money, perhaps that’s not so surprising after all.

George Lucas, managing director, Instreet Investment

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

Comments (8)

  • avatar
    98% of our SMSF clients are switched-on, engaged and well informed. Whether they're smarter than retail or industry funds is a pointless argument. What matters is that SMSF trustees continue to have the freedom to invest their savings in a manner that suits their particular philosophy (within well established parameters), and yes make 'mistakes' along the way. By the way who doesn't? Please, let's avoid the nanny state impulse.
    0
  • avatar
    Look at the returns from SMSF for the last say 10 years and then look at the Retail funds and the results speak for themselves - the retail funds have not delivered and are now fraudulently asserting trustee's of SMSF are not sophisticated investors - also Unions would like to get their hands on the pot of GOLD
    0
  • avatar
    Bewilered Industry Observer Thursday, 28 November 2013
    A good article George. With the average SMSF balance just tipping past $1M you would think that these trustees are switched on. It cannot be just dumb luck that trustees have created wealth of this magnitude.
    0
  • avatar
    Yep all the detractors have an axe to grind and should grow up,mind their own business.
    0
  • avatar
    Most SMSF trusteees are just as educated as any industry fund trustee, probably more so as they arent just another job for the boys lackey.
    0
  • avatar
    It is obvious that SMSF Trustees are smarter than most people give credit for.Whose business is it anyway?
    0
  • avatar
    Well after all IT IS their money. I audit over 40 SMSF's & administer a further 40.

    Only about 5 of those funds IMO shouldn't be doing or investing the way they are. The rest are using SMSF the way they should be. Long term investors who basically set & forget.
    I just wish the 'experts' & regulators would just leave them alone.
    0
  • avatar
    Totally agree George, a good percentage of SMSF trustees are very well read and take great interest in how and were the markets are moving. They look for new trends in both in markets and services eg the move to ETF's has been spectacular in recent years, more and more the focus is on DIY's who know what they want and will do the required research to make good prudent investment choices. Like the shift over the past few years to ETF we are also seeing many are silently protesting against paying commissions to financial planners who are not adding value we are seeing a shift to full fee for service clients for more strategic advise and service...
    0
avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is 10MB. Only gif,jpg,png files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as