Login
Login
Exploring Division 296 alternatives that don't tax paper profits
In the latest episode of the SMSF Adviser Show, hosts Keith Ford and Aaron Dunn break down some of the alternative methods to remove concessions for large super balances without resorting to taxing unrealised gains, with a range of options being delivered in recent weeks.
The IFPA put forward compulsory cashing, while Geoff Wilson and Wilson Asset Management offered up a progressive super surcharge model, with both looking to meet the government’s stated aim for Division 296 in a manner that leaves unrealised gains untouched.
Listen as they discuss:
You’re out of free articles for this month
To continue reading the rest of this article, please log in.
Create free account to get unlimited news articles and more!
- What is missing when the government talks about liquidity and diversity requirements for super funds that hold farmland.
- The spike in SMSF-related complaints to AFCA, largely on the back of major financial failures like United Global Capital.
- When Division 296 is likely to land back in parliament.
You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Subscribe to the
BULLETIN
Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning
Subscribe
