Aged care reforms need more consideration: SMSFA
The SMSF Association said the government needs to carefully consider funding arrangements before implementing reforms in the aged care sector to ensure they are fair and equitable.
In a submission to the consultation on the exposure draft of the New Aged Care Act, the SMSFA, in conjunction with the Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand, CPA Australia, and the Financial Advice Association of Australia, stated that although it understands the need for the reforms to take place as soon as practicable in the sector, there is “merit in having guidance and clarity in the funding arrangements for these significant reforms to run smoothly when they commence”.
“The priority of our organisations is the funding arrangements for aged care, including means testing, subsidies, payment and fee arrangements,” the submission stated.
The submission said it was disappointing that feedback from the Aged Care Taskforce consultation could not be incorporated into the exposure draft of the bill for the New Aged Care Act consultation, given it is a fundamentally important part of the aged care system.
“In line with our feedback to other government consultations and inquiries, one of our main aims will be to ensure that the aged care funding system works harmoniously with the retirement income system, particularly social security benefits and the superannuation system,” it said.
The SMSFA and joint accounting and advice bodies said they have many members involved in all areas of aged care, including in providing accounting expertise to assist the finance and management reporting areas of aged care providers and offering financial advice and support to consumers and their families to understand how the aged care rules work and how aged care services and costs interact with other services to meet the consumer’s needs.
“Given the important role our members play in assisting their clients with aged care needs, we would welcome the opportunity to be involved in the ongoing drafting discussions on the funding arrangements for future inclusion in chapter 4 of the New Aged Care Act,” it added.
The submission also called for clarity on the role of financial advisers in assisting clients with their aged care needs, stating it is a requirement in the legislated Financial Adviser Code of Ethics for financial advisers to consider the potential future aged care needs of clients.
“This can include acting as the client’s representative in relation to aged care matters and when interacting with aged care providers. However, it is unclear how the function of financial advisers, defined under the Corporations Act as ‘relevant providers’, fits into the role of an ‘advocate’, ‘representative’ or ‘supporter’ under the Exposure Draft,” it said.
“The law should clarify how the interaction between the definitions (and the intended role of a person acting under these definitions) in the exposure draft applies to the assistance financial advisers provide clients in relation to their aged care needs.“
Given the provision of financial advice is heavily regulated under the Corporations Act and the code, with oversight by ASIC, the submission recommends it be made clear that “relevant providers” operating under corporations law are not intended to be captured under the definitions or provisions in the New Aged Care Act.
