Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMSF adviser logo
subscribe to our newsletter

Capacity tipped to become big issue in future BDBN disputes

Capacity tipped to become big issue in future BDBN disputes
By mbrownlee
07 November 2022 — 1 minute read

Advisers have been warned that incapacity issue are likely to be a significant factor in disputes over binding death benefit nominations in coming years.

Speaking in a recent webinar, Cooper Grace Ward Lawyers partner Hayley Mitchell said while there isn’t any case law examining capacity in relation to making a binding death benefit nomination (BDBN) this will likely become a bigger issue for estate planning disputes in the future.

“Given the prevalence of estate disputes, an ageing population and the increase in incapacity that we are seeing with some of our clients, it think it’s something we are going to see more of,” Ms Mitchel warned.

She referred to the recent decision, Walter William Nespolon v Lindy van Camp [2022] NSWSC 1190 where a trustee had sought advice about their ability to defend a claim relating to the validity of the BDBN.

While the main proceedings for this dispute have not been heard yet, Ms Mitchel said that the BDBNs will likely be disputed in the main proceedings on the basis of a lack of capacity.

Ms Mitchell noted that the BDBN was prepared two days before death and that the solicitor who prepared the BDBN had noted concerns about the deceased’s capacity in her file notes.

Advisers she warned need to be aware that a BDBN could be attacked based on factors like lack of capacity.

“We need to ensure that we get that right during the estate planning phase,” she said.

While Ms Mitchel said there isn’t a judgement on this specific issue, its highly likely that the courts are going to say that the requisite capacity to make a BDBN will be similar to that of a will.

“So if we’ve got a client that we’ve just emailed a binding nomination to and we haven’t we haven’t visited or spoken to the client personally about the nomination and the ramifications to really test or provide evidence of their capacity then I think we’ve got real risks of those nominations potentially being reversed,” she cautioned.

 

 

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning