You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Unpaid present entitlements may 'raise questions’, SMSFs cautioned

news
By mbrownlee
August 10 2022
1 minute read
2 View Comments
Unpaid present entitlements may 'raise questions’, SMSFs cautioned
expand image

SMSFs have been warned that having unpaid present entitlements in a unit trust without good reason could result in potential compliance issues for the fund, even where the trust is unrelated.

Speaking in a recent webinar, DBA Lawyers senior associate Shaun Backhaus explained that sometimes where SMSFs invest in unit trust, unpaid present entitlements (UPEs) can arise.

The ATO released a ruling relating to SMSFs and UPEs in 2009, SMSFR 2009/3.

 
 

“In this ruling, the Commissioner's view is that where an SMSF is entitled to distributions from a related trust which are not paid to the SMSF, this can result in a number of superannuation law contraventions which include the arm's length rules, sole purpose tests, and in-house assets from being a loan because there's something owing from the unit trust,” said Mr Backhaus.

However, this particular ruling only discusses a related trust — it doesn’t talk about situations involving an unrelated trust, he noted.

Where there is an unrelated trust involved, the ATO’s position on this is less clear, he said.

“[Even where it is an unrelated trust], there would need to be some good reasons why those UPEs were there,” he said.

Mr Backhaus said there may be a reason for having unpaid present entitlements such as cash flow being tight with a property development, for example.

“Sometimes they can make sense, but you need to make that clear and record it and pay it when you can,” he explained.

“The UPEs would definitely need to be proportionate; you couldn’t just have the SMSF having UPEs — that would look weird. You also wouldn’t want them to be outstanding for too long either as that may raise questions.”

Mr Backhaus said the SMSF professionals and their clients would also need to evaluate whether the UPEs are in line with normal commercial operations.

The ATO previously clarified in ATO ID 2012/74 that if UPEs are kept proportionate then no loan will arise for Division 7A purposes, he noted.

“So, we have a bit of a position on that,” he said.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!
Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: miranda.brownlee@momentummedia.com.au

Comments (2)

  • avatar
    It also seems to be common when setting up unrelated trust investments, to issue initial units only to the investors (including SMSFs) then “loan” the balance of the investments into the unit trust. Presumably this less paperwork than issuing further units, particularly if there is disparity in the timing of receiving the capital, and possibly avoids stamp duty issues in some States.

    The problem from an SMSF perspective is that typically there is no loan agreement, no scheduled repayments, security or documented interest rate. Such a loan can’t be considered to be at arms length as required by SIS Section 109.

    The SMSF trustee often believes they have only an investment in a unit trust, when in fact the majority of it is a loan.

    Such shortcuts in not issuing additional units may be acceptable for most investors, but not SMSFs.
    0
  • avatar
    What is the big deal about a proportionate UPE? It is exactly the same as a DRP in a pblicly listed company!
    0
avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is 10MB. Only gif,jpg,png files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as