subscribe to our newsletter

ATO sets out recommended approach to legal privilege claims

Jotham Lian
24 September 2021 — 2 minute read

The ATO’s recommended approach to making legal professional privilege claims has now been published, providing tax advisers with insights into the regulator’s expectations and concerns.

The ATO on Wednesday released its draft legal professional privilege (LPP) protocol, setting out its recommended approach to identifying communications covered by LPP, and the level of detail required in explaining claims.

The Tax Office states that following the protocol is voluntary but also notes that those who do not follow the recommended approach should expect further inquiries to determine if the LPP claims are acceptable.


Under the draft protocol, taxpayers will be required to provide details on the legal issue being advised on, the dominant purpose for which the communication was made, along with other particulars of people who received the document or communication.

Taxpayers will also have to identify whether they have received advice from legal practitioners, in-house counsel, or non-legal persons or by legal practitioners not acting in the capacity of legal practitioners, with different assessments required for each category.

The recommended approach comes as the ATO looks to crack down on the misuse of LPP, with Commissioner of Taxation Chris Jordan warning in 2019 that he intended to take a tougher stance after noticing lawyers “claiming privilege on thousands or tens of thousands of documents”.

“Don’t misunderstand me – we’re not opposed to legal professional privilege as a concept. We want taxpayers to be able to get the right and proper legal advice,” said Mr Jordan.

“It all comes back to fairness – are you using legal professional privilege because you have a genuine need, or as a way to cheat the system?”

One arrangement that will attract the ATO’s attention is where LPP is actively promoted as a feature of tax advice, or where advice is routed through a lawyer merely for the purpose of obtaining privilege.

“This is different to where an advisory firm is merely pointing out that privilege is an ordinary feature of communications that are for the sole or dominant purpose of giving or receiving legal advice or advice for litigation,” said the ATO in its draft protocol.

The ATO will also take a dim view of legal engagements entered into after the advice was provided by non-legal persons, or where unsolicited concepts and ideas were promoted to the taxpayer prior to a legal engagement.

The release of the draft protocol also comes against the backdrop of a high-profile legal stoush between the ATO and PwC over privilege claims relating to thousands of documents in the big four firm’s work for meat production multinational JBS.

More recently, the Full Federal Court handed down its decision in a case involving Carlton & United Breweries (CUB) and the ATO, ruling in favour of the Tax Office in seeking information considered necessary to determine whether to accept or challenge CUB’s LPP claims.

The draft protocol, currently open for consultation until 31 October, will continue to be reviewed over the next three years.


ATO sets out recommended approach to legal privilege claims
ato newstill 3 smsf
smsfadviser logo

Are you up to date with the legislative changes from 1 July? Contribution cap increases, super guarantees, age increases, SG rate increases. The budget announcement changes. Don’t be caught off guard by your clients’ questions. Prepare for any scenario with the SMSF Foundations course. 21 CPD hours available. Learn more

Arm yourself with the critical information that you need to ensure you and your clients continue to thrive in today’s changing environment at the free-to-stream SMSF Adviser Technical Strategy Day. Live streamed directly to you in October over three days, this event is jam-packed with expert-led sessions to arm you for success by providing the latest updates on regulatory and legislative changes impacting SMSFs. Secure your free spot today, visit www.smsfstrategyday.com.au

join the discussion

Latest poll

Do you have clients that are aged 65 or 66 planning to trigger the bring forward rules?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.