subscribe to our newsletter

Arising capital gains tax complexities for SMSFs ahead of TBC indexation

tim miller new smsf 1fda
Tony Zhang
24 February 2021 — 3 minute read

The indexation of the transfer balance cap (TBC) will spark capital gains tax intricacies, with SMSF advisers encouraged to develop new strategies to help address the shake-up.

Speaking at the SMSF Association National Conference 2021, SuperGuardian technical expert Tim Miller said that with the way that capital gains tax (CGT) rules work, with reference to super and estate planning, there will be changing complexities that need to be understood.

Broadening rules and regulatory updates may cause a need for a shift in tax strategy, he said.


“Eventually, a member will pass away in the accumulation space and so capital gains tax becomes a real issue that needs to be addressed. What we need to do in that situation is try and avoid capital gains tax and lump-sum tax as well, so we want to make sure that we don’t double down on the tax liability for the fund or the end beneficiary,” Mr Miller said.

Zooming in on the indexation of the transfer balance cap ($1.7 million) and the disregarded small fund asset limit ($1.6 million), Mr Miller said if the SMSF is contemplating asset segregation in a pension environment, then there could be further complexities as the rules can be a “little bit quirky with how they operate in that regard”.

“The key message here is that we do get a partial or a full CGT exemption via our exempt current pension income (ECPI) deduction when paying a retirement phase income stream,” Mr Miller said.

“Previously, this only applied because the ECPI deduction ceased on the death of the pensioner, so if weve got a reversionary pension then the pension itself doesnt cease and the deduction doesnt cease.

“But what we saw in this regulatory change that took place, where if youve got a death benefit income stream, if you had a pension that wasnt reversionary and the pensions seized, then the CGT would kick back in.”

Mr Miller added that such regulatory change created a new environment, meaning that “as long as you pay out the death benefit either via lump sum or as a new death benefit income stream, then the sale of any assets that occurs as soon as practical after the death of the member will still be entitled to that exempt current pension income deduction”.

“So, youve got this capacity to segregate assets if you satisfy the disregarded small fund asset rules and are able to segregate,” Mr Miller said.

“Youve got the capacity to place assets in that tax-exempt environment which will then exempt them from CGT if you need to sell them down to pay out the death benefit.”

Mr Miller said the concept of being able to sell assets early or sell assets as part of the death benefit and avoid tax will be contingent in many respects on the disregarded small fund asset situation and whether pensions are reversionary or not.

“Now there is a quirk with that hole that the deduction ceases on death, but youve got this exemption as long as the payment is made as soon as practicable, to suggest that if youve got insurance proceeds that come into the fund, the ECPI deduction is not attributable to any earnings on those income or insurance proceeds,” he said.

“The very fact that you have a non-reversionary pension and youve got insurance, if those insurance proceeds come in and theres some time before the death benefit is paid, then the earnings from the insurance are going to be taxable versus the earnings from the assets that were previously supporting the pensions.”

Administratively, that will add levels of complexity, Mr Miller noted, adding that this would prompt a debate as to whether there should or should not have insurance in the fund, and whether pensions should be reversionary or non-reversionary.

“There are so many sorts of paths that we need to take ourselves down with regard to this space to work out what is the right or the wrong option for our clients,” he said.

“Generally, what we need to understand is that we if weve got death and our clients are in a TRIS, if theyre going to transition to the retirement income stream and theyre in accumulation, so they might have a TRIS and they wont be in accumulation, so they have not satisfied that further condition of release yet, then it could result in the tax on the benefit payment and a tax on the asset sale, and we need to be mindful of that.”

Arising capital gains tax complexities for SMSFs ahead of TBC indexation
tim miller new smsf 1fda
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do you have clients that are aged 65 or 66 planning to trigger the bring forward rules?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.