subscribe to our newsletter

SMSFA pushes for de minimis threshold with NALI rules

Peter Burgess
Miranda Brownlee
16 September 2020 — 1 minute read

With the Treasury supporting the ATO’s view that the non-arm’s length income rules should apply to general expenses, the best hope for the industry now is for a “safe harbour” or “de minimis” threshold to be introduced, says the SMSF association.

On 2 October last year, the government amended the non-arm’s length income rules which effectively broadened the application of these rules.

The amendments mean that even if the income a fund receives is on commercial arm’s-length terms, if the fund has not incurred an expense in relation to that income on commercial arm’s-length terms, the fund is still required to tax all the income as non-arm’s length income, explained SMSF Association deputy chief executive Peter Burgess.


The ATO also issued a draft ruling the same day the amendments were legislated which stated that the new requirement would not only extend to specific investments but also extends to general expenses.

“The ATO stated [however] that they would not be taking any compliance action in the 2018–19, 2019–20 and 2020–21 income years, where an expense that has not been incurred on arm’s-length terms is a general expense, so it doesnt have any direct nexus to a particular investment in the fund,” Mr Burgess said.

Speaking at a recent Tax Institute conference, Mr Burgess said the industry is still waiting for the final ruling to be issued from the ATO on how they will be applying these new provisions, particularly in situations where the expenses are general expenses.

“The SMSF Association has put a submission forward that we believe it shouldnt be applied to general expenses. We dont think thats going to get up. We understand that the Treasury supports the ATOs view that these new NALI rules should apply to general expenses as well as specific expenses that apply to a particular investment,” he said.

“If that is the case, then we would like to see some form of safe harbour or de minimis threshold introduced to avoid situations where the fund doesnt incur a small accounting fee, for example, and that results in all the income from the fund taxed as non-arms length income.”

“We dont think thats appropriate, so were looking to hopefully see some form of de minimis threshold in place so that, unless the expenses are over a certain amount, it shouldnt provoke these new provisions.”

Mr Burgess said the SMSF industry is also still waiting to see how the new rules will be applied to staff discounts.

“In situations where an accounting firm may provide discounts to staff to have their SMSF administered by their firm, will that invoke these new provisions? Were looking for clarification on that in the final draft ruling,” Mr Burgess said.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

SMSFA pushes for de minimis threshold with NALI rules
peter burgess smsf
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do you think the government will make significant changes to the taxation of super in the Budget this year?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.