Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
BDBNs, separate funds worthwhile for blended families

BDBNs, separate funds worthwhile for blended families

Turnbull Hill Lawyers
Sarah Kendell
04 September 2019 — 1 minute read

SMSF trustees with blended families can look at a variety of options to safeguard their super assets from family conflict after their death, including binding death benefit nominations and setting up separate funds for different family branches, according to a specialist estate planning lawyer.

In a recent podcast, Turnbull Hill Lawyers’ Rani Ghanda said if a trustee was looking at remarrying, and restructuring their assets as a result, it was important to minimise the chances of a dispute between the families in any estate plan.

“It’s very important if people have an SMSF that they do a binding nomination, and it becomes increasingly important if you’ve got a situation where you may have a blended family,” Ms Ghanda said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“You may have a father that is remarried to a new partner and they are both trustees in the SMSF, and the father passes away. He may want his super to go to his children from the first marriage, but if there is no binding nomination and the wife is left as the trustee, she may determine to pay herself.”

Ms Ghanda said regardless of the preferences of the surviving trustee, binding nominations could not be dismissed as long as they were written in accordance with the fund deed and had ideally been previously sighted by the surviving trustee.

“Usually, what we suggest is when you make a binding nomination, you get the trustee to sign the back acknowledging it, so the father’s new partner couldn’t say, ‘I didn’t know anything about this and I’m not going to accept it as the trustee’,” she said.

Alternatively, another strategy to avoid conflict with blended family estate planning was to set up separate SMSFs for different family branches, Ms Ghanda added.

“It would depend on the asset base you are talking about versus the compliance costs of having those two funds, but if you’ve got a blended family and you’re going into a relationship with very established assets, you may want to have two SMSFs,” she said.

“The majority of assets are now held in super and the family home, so it’s important that when you are setting a fund up from the beginning you think about these issues, and that may determine how you set it up so they don’t become a problem.”

BDBNs, separate funds worthwhile for blended families
turnbull hill lawyers smsf
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do any of your clients have related party LRBAs?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.