X
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
Get the latest news! Subscribe to the SMSF Adviser bulletin
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
  • News
    • Money
    • Education
    • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
No Results
View All Results
Home News

SMSFs told to hold fire on TSB double counting issue

Following discussions with the ATO, a technical expert has said SMSF trustees impacted by the double counting issue with the total superannuation balance may not be required to redo their TBARs.

by Miranda Brownlee
August 14, 2019
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

This week, SMSF Adviser reported on a double counting issue arising for SMSF clients that commenced a pension on 1 July 2017 due to certain transitional rules that were previously in place.

SuperConcepts SMSF technical specialist Anthony Cullen said some clients are trying to ascertain how they received an excess non-concessional contribution notice for the 2018 financial year, on the back of a purported total superannuation balance (TSB) above $1.6 million.

X

“Their TSB should not be above this level and appears to have been derived from the double counting of balances that existed on 30 June 2017 and subsequently used to commence a pension on 1 July 2017,” Mr Cullen explained.

“We’ve spoken to the ATO and they acknowledge they’re investigating with a view to providing more detailed clarity in the near future.”

Mr Cullen said one client has successfully resolved the matter over the phone, although they have not yet received written confirmation of this.

“For another client, they have progressed down the path of objecting to the excess non-concessional contribution notice, as this appears the only avenue available to them,” he said.

“These two cases not only highlight an inconsistent approach to dealing with the matter but a broader misunderstanding of the nature of the problem itself.”

He also highlighted that contacting the ATO to discuss options for rectifying the issue is problematic when you are the tax agent for the SMSF and not the individual.

“Although we are responsible for lodging the TBAR, the ATO will still cite privacy reasons for not discussing the matter with us. This is another example where being the tax agent for the SMSF and not the individual hampers our ability to deal with the ATO directly on a matter,” he said.

Mr Cullen said following recent discussions with the ATO, it may not actually be necessary for clients to cancel existing transfer balance account reporting due to the TSB double counting issue.

“We’ve seen a lot of concern from our own customers and some confused analysis in the market about this issue, but we do not believe that reports will need to be redone.”

While the issue may be an unintended consequence stemming from the transitional interaction between a member’s TBA and TSB on 1 July 2017, Mr Cullen said a resolution is “needed urgently”.

“It has the potential to impact any clients who are looking to understand their non-concessional contribution bring-forward limits prior to making contributions in the current financial year,” he stressed.

Tags: News

Related Posts

Move assets before death to avoid tax implications: SMSF legal specialist

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

Mitigating the impact of death benefit tax can be supported by ensuring the SMSF deed allows for the transfer of...

Investment rules can decide if crypto is a safe call

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

Before investing in cryptocurrencies like bitcoin, SMSF trustees have to consider whether it complies with the SMSF investment rules, a...

Impact of EOY shutdown on new SMSF registrants

by Keeli Cambourne
November 25, 2025

The ATO has warned trustees that its end-of-year shutdowns may cause delays for new SMSF new registrants.

Comments 1

  1. Dana Fleming-Assistant Commiss says:
    6 years ago

    SMSFs do not need to amend their TBAR reporting where an incorrect ENCC determination may have issued because they reported pensions with an effective date of 30 June 2017 and 1 July 2017 for a member. The ENCC determination may issue in these circumstances due to an ATO systems issue, but should be amended within 4 weeks. If the ENCC determination is not amended after 4 weeks, you should contact us by emailing SuperAdvice@ato.gov.au

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Join our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.
SMSF Adviser is the authoritative source of news, opinions and market intelligence for Australia’s SMSF sector. The SMSF sector now represents more than one million members and approximately one third of Australia's superannuation savings. Over the past five years the number of SMSF members has increased by close to 30 per cent, highlighting the opportunity for engaged, informed and driven professionals to build successful SMSF advice business.

Subscribe to our newsletter

View our privacy policy, collection notice and terms and conditions to understand how we use your personal information.

About Us

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Collection Notice
  • Privacy Policy

Popular Topics

  • News
  • Strategy
  • Money
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • Feature Articles
  • Education
  • Video

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited

No Results
View All Results
NEWSLETTER
  • News
  • Money
  • Education
  • Strategy
  • Webcasts
  • Features
  • Events
  • Podcasts
  • Promoted Content
  • About
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us

© 2025 All Rights Reserved. All content published on this site is the property of Prime Creative Media. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited