subscribe to our newsletter
SMSFs cautioned on administrative traps with foreign property

SMSFs cautioned on administrative traps with foreign property

Tim Miller
Miranda Brownlee
09 July 2019 — 1 minute read

SMSF professionals have been cautioned on some of the compliance issues that can arise with foreign property in SMSFs, especially where clients may be secretly using the property for purposes other than investment.

Speaking at a recent Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand event, Miller Super Solutions founder Tim Miller said that foreign jurisdictions often have their own rules around how property needs to be held that can cause potential compliance traps for SMSFs. 

“Some parts of Asia, for example, will require you to have a resident citizen who is on the title. Now if you’ve got that in an SMSF, how are you going to meet the definition of an Australian superannuation fund? So, you’ve got potential issues there,” he explained.


“The US, as with most other jurisdictions, don’t recognise Australian trusts and so there’s often a requirement to invest and hold the property via a limited liability company. Now if you hold that asset via a limited liability company, that now looks like a 13.22 arrangement, because you’re holding the property inside a company.”

The SMSF client will then need to think about what banking details they have linked to that, he said.

“Is the income going into a US bank account or is it flowing over here into an Australian bank account, because if its going into the US bank account, then are you satisfying the requirements of the approved deposit taking institution?” he said.

“So, when youre buying property overseas, you need to be mindful of what issues might be associated with the holding of those properties.”

It is also often the case with foreign property, he said, that the members very conveniently state that theyre not living in the house.

“They say that theyve living in Australia, but theyre a little bit shy in identifying who is living in the house in the country where their family is. I think thats often been one of the issues that weve often seen administratively... using other jurisdictions to invest in property overseas for purposes other than investment returns,” he said.

SMSFs cautioned on administrative traps with foreign property
tim miller new smsf
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

When do you plan to undertake the exam under the new adviser education standards?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.