Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
FASEA standards inflicting ‘study for study’s sake’ on accountants

FASEA standards inflicting ‘study for study’s sake’ on accountants

Accountants
Miranda Brownlee
02 November 2018 — 1 minute read

With accountants already meeting the requirements of the proposed FASEA standards with the exception of the exam, one of the major accounting bodies has urged FASEA against enforcing further study on accountants.

After months of consulting with the accounting, financial planning and education sector, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand (CA ANZ) senior policy adviser and Accountants IQ founder Bronny Speed said there is widespread confusion about what education counts, the exam, how CPD will be consistently accredited across all professional member bodies and whether credit will be given for ethics subjects that have already been examined.

“Accountants are well positioned as far as FASEA’s standards are concerned, and members of CA ANZ and CPA Australia don’t believe a major overhaul of their requirements to gain and retain their professional designations will result in a big improvement to the industry,” said Ms Speed.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“In fact, it may be of detriment to the industry, as many accountants plan to exit should the proposed reforms be implemented as they currently stand.”

A recent straw poll conducted by SMSF Adviser comprising 2,002 votes showed that over a third or 37.1 per cent indicated they would either exit the advice industry or cease offering advice services as an accountant.

A further 14.5 per cent indicated they would remain working in their firm but stop offering advice to clients.

Ms Speed explained that accountants are already highly educated professionals, have completed a three-year practical mentoring program, are obliged to adhere to a strict code of ethics and undertake significant ongoing professional development.

“Professional advisers who have fulfilled these requirements and have not been under any form of ASIC disciplinary action should be able to continue to practice in their chosen field without further study,” she said.

“Why should study for study’s sake even be considered? What’s the point of further bridging courses when the above mentioned exam will contain much of the same subject matter?”

FASEA standards inflicting ‘study for study’s sake’ on accountants
adviser smsf client 1
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Which political party will deliver better outcomes on superannuation policy?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super