Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

SMSFs caught up in ABN reforms

Parliament
Miranda Brownlee
20 July 2018 — 1 minute read

A government proposal to introduce periodic renewals for ABNs could see SMSFs hit with an annual renewal fee or facing non-compliance where they miss the deadline to renew.

In response to findings from the Black Economy Taskforce, Treasury has released a consultation paper with proposals for reforming the current ABN system to crack down on participants in the black economy using the system to provide a false sense of legitimacy to their business.

Possible changes to the ABN system include adjusting ABN entitlement rules, imposing conditions on ABN holders, and introducing a renewal process including a renewal fee.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The consultation paper stated that periodic renewals would prompt ABN holders to reconsider their eligibility, update their details, and serve as a reminder of the associated penalties for supplying false information, Treasury said.

Treasury is also proposing that a fee be charged for renewal, consistent with the fees charged renewing a company or business name. As it stands, it’s $36 to register a business name, and $36 annually to renew.

Insyt chief executive Darren Wynen said given that SMSFs apply for an ABN when they register the SMSF with the ATO, SMSFs could also be impacted by these proposals, even though they’re not the target of the reforms.

“The target is really participants in the black economy who are using the ABN system illegitimately, but there's been no suggestion that SMSFs have been using ABNs in that way so it would to be a bit of a fee grab if SMSFs were forced to pay some sort of renewal fee for their ABN,” said Mr Wynen.

If cancellation is a consequence of failing to renew the ABN, Mr Wynen said it could also be very problematic for SMSFs from a compliance perspective.

“All of a sudden they could be put in the same basket as non-complying funds or funds that don't comply with the lodgement of returns and have their regulation details withheld [by the ATO],” he warned.

“Certainly that could create a problem if regulation details are withheld, that might prevent rollovers being made to the fund for example.”

In the paper, Treasury noted some of the problems that could arise if cancellation was a consequence of failing to meet ABN obligations.  

Treasury is inviting interested parties to comment on the consultation until 31 August 2018.

 

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

SMSFs caught up in ABN reforms
parliament391
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.