subscribe to our newsletter
New litigation case sees SMSF auditor responsible for losses

New litigation case sees SMSF auditor responsible for losses

Gavel, documents, papers, litigation case
Miranda Brownlee
13 July 2018

A decision by the NSW Court of Appeal which held an SMSF auditor responsible for losses incurred by an SMSF indicates that SMSF auditors are being “held to a high standard by courts”, says an industry lawyer.

In the case Cam & Bear Pty Ltd v McGoldrick, the NSW Court of Appeal was asked to consider where the actions of an SMSF auditor, John McGoldrick caused the losses suffered by an SMSF.

The trustee of the SMSF, Cam & Bear, was established for Dr Lance Bear and his wife, Ms Jennifer Campbell. Dr Bear and Ms Campbell were directors of the trustee for the SMSF.

Mr McGoldrick was an accountant who audited the accounts of the fund, including for the financial years ended 30 June 2003 to 2007.

Some years after the fund was established, a close friend of Dr Bear, Mr Anthony Lewis, who conducted a finance business, suggested that his company, Lewis Securities Ltd, manage the fund’s investments. Mr Lewis also suggested that another company in which he held a 35 per cent interest, Databank Investment Services Pty Ltd, undertake the fund’s administration, according to the evidence provided by Dr Bear.

According to Dr Bear, from about 1996 until 2008, he understood from his conversations with Mr Lewis, and from financial accounts that he received from time to time, that the fund’s assets consisted of cash amounts and shares.

In reality, the money was actually lent on an unsecured basis to Mr Lewis’ company LSL Holdings, DBA Layers senior associate David Oon explained in a webinar.

The investments were recorded as “cash – LSL Holdings P/L” in the SMSF’s financials.

Mr McGoldrick, the auditor, queried the description but Mr Lewis told him the SMSF trustee was happy with the description. Mr McGoldrick did not directly communicate with Dr Bear.

When Dr Bear went to withdraw cash from the SMSF to start a new medical practice, he was unable to, since the contributions had been used for unsecured loans. Mr Lewis’ companies went into voluntary administration soon after that.

“Dr Bear felt he had suffered loss at the fault of Mr McGoldrick who didn’t warn him that the investments may not be recoverable,” explained Mr Oon.

Cam & Bear Pty Ltd then sued Mr McGoldrick for damages for negligence and misleading and deceptive conduct.

The case was heard by a single judge in the Supreme Court of NSW with the court finding that while Mr McGoldrick had been negligent and engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct, these defaults had not caused any loss to the appellant.

An appeal was then brought by Cam & Bear Pty Ltd against Mr John McGoldrick which was heard by three judges of the NSW Court of Appeal, explained Mr Oon.

“The court said that failure to tell Dr Bear the loans might not be recoverable caused Dr Bear to continue to make contributions, which would not have been made otherwise,” said Mr Oon.

“Overturning the earlier decision, McGoldrick’s negligence was found to have caused the loss.”

In its judgement the court concluded that responsibility for the loss should be apportioned 10 per cent to Cam & Bear and 90 per cent to Mr McGoldrick.

The court found that the company which compiled the fund’s financial statements, Databank Pty Ltd, was not liable to Cam & Bear as there was no evidence as to the basis on which the company was engaged.

The court said that “Mr McGoldrick was a very experienced accountant and auditor who was engaged for the purpose of protecting the fund and its trustee against financial risks that included the very type of risk that eventuated”.

It also said that McGoldrick was “clearly negligent in failing to make proper enquiries as to the recoverability of the amounts held by LSL Holdings and failing to report the results of those enquiries to the appellant trustee”.

Mr Oon said the case makes it clear that “auditors are being held to a high standard by courts, especially when the clients are not financially sophisticated”.

New litigation case sees SMSF auditor responsible for losses
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What do you plan to do in response to the new adviser education standards?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super