Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
‘Pointless’ move for SMSFs slammed

‘Pointless’ move for SMSFs slammed

stop hand382
Miranda Brownlee
27 June 2018 — 1 minute read

The government should exclude SMSFs from its proposal to require all super funds to have a retirement income covenant given that SMSFs are prevented from issuing pooled income stream products anyway, says an industry law firm.

In May, the government released its Retirement Income Covenant position paper which included a proposal to require all superannuation funds, including SMSFs, to develop a retirement income strategy for members and regularly review it.

In an online update, Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers said the covenant will require trustees of superannuation funds to consider the retirement income needs and preferences of their members.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The retirement income covenant, Townsends said, is associated with the government’s proposal to introduce pooled income streams, also called comprehensive income products for retirement (CIPRs) where the super balances are pooled as participating investors exchange their individual account balances for an income stream financed by the pooled balances.

“One significant feature of these pooled products is the restricted commutation rights which provide that a proportion of the original balance will be paid out and this proportion reduces over time to nil over the life expectancy of the investor,” the law firm explained.

“However, if the investor dies within the first half of their life expectancy period, the commutation amount is 100 per cent of the initial balance.”

The only problem with the retirement income covenant, it said, is that SMSFs are prevented from offering pooled income streams.

“Additionally, given that members must be the trustees, subject to limited exceptions, and given that the vast majority of SMSFs have only one or two members, there seems little point in requiring SMSF trustees to consult with the membership over income stream products which the fund cannot issue to the members,” said Townsends.

“Hopefully, the government will restrict this proposal to only those superannuation funds which are permitted to and intend to issue pooled income stream products.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

‘Pointless’ move for SMSFs slammed
stop hand382
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do any of your clients have related party LRBAs?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.