Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Audit cycle proposal ‘a snow job’ by the government

Audit cycle proposal ‘a snow job’ by the government

coins pens 384
Miranda Brownlee
15 May 2018 — 1 minute read

The proposed change to the SMSF audit cycle is a marketing gimmick by the government that will see little reduction in services or compliance while “painting auditors as villains”, according to one audit and accounting firm.

Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Nexia Brisbane chief executive Ken Robertson said if the government does proceed with the measure to change the annual audit cycle to three years for SMSFs with good audit history, he suspects that many firms, like his, will still complete interim SMSF audits on an annual basis.

“From a practical perspective, if we’ve still got the same number of transactions we’ve got to go through for an audit, then we’re going to be doing it the same way as we are now,” he said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The only difference, Mr Robertson said, is that the actual audit report will be issued once every three years instead of every year.

“How could you possibly do three years of transactions in one year? What are you going to do with the staff that are going to have to do that every third year – pay them to sit around and twiddle their thumbs for the other two years? I suspect not,” he said.

The practicality, Mr Robertson said, is that auditors would still to do an interim audit on the financials because the tax agent will still be preparing a set of financials and a tax return every year.

“We’ve thought this one through and we can’t see that there’s going to be that much change in our activity,” he said.

The proposed measure is therefore merely “a snow job by the government”, Mr Robertson said, where they’re claiming that they’re helping with compliance but it reality “doing absolutely zero and sticking out misinformation”.

The most difficult part about the measure, he said, will be explaining to clients, who believe they only need to pay for one audit every three years, that interim audits will still need to be undertaken.

“The government has done an old marketing trick here. They’re painting themselves as the heroes, and they’re going to paint people like us who [tell clients] that there’s no change as the villains,” Mr Robertson said.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Audit cycle proposal ‘a snow job’ by the government
coins pens 384
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.