Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

Lawyer highlights impact of accounting methods on TSB

DBA Lawyers senior associate William Fettes
Miranda Brownlee
03 May 2018 — 1 minute read

SMSF practitioners may want to consider using tax effect accounting for SMSFs in some cases to avoid overstating their client’s total superannuation balance, says an industry lawyer.

DBA Lawyers senior associate William Fettes said the total superannuation balance is one of the most important concepts introduced as part of the major superannuation reforms, and that accounting methods, such as tax effect accounting, can have an impact on the balance amount.

Mr Fettes said tax effect accounting is optional for SMSFs, and many SMSFs do not apply it, as SMSFs are generally not reporting entities.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Tax effect accounting can be a prudent accounting policy that you might consider adopting, and one of the things that it can facilitate is the ability to recognise deferred tax liabilities where there is some reasonable certainty that a future tax liability will arise at the fund level,” he explained.

For example, tax on a net capital gain where the fund will not be in retirement phase, or tax when a ‘deferred notional gain’ is brought to account.

Mr Fettes explained how tax effect accounting can operate with an example of a two-member fund, where both members have equal account balances.

“The SMSF trustee uses the proportionate CGT relief to reset the cost base of a rental property to its market value of $1 million. Now the property had an original cost base of $250,000 and the SMSF trustee elects to defer the notional gain,” he said.

“We have our capital gains, we've got the one third discount, and then we need to think about the non-exempt portion. Let’s suppose it's 50 per cent in pension phase, therefore, we'd have $250,000 that we're dealing with and that is our deferred notional gain. We're looking at a potential deferred tax liability of 15 per cent of that, which is $37,500 and obviously that's split between two members. So we can see an illustration of the difference in using tax effect accounting.”

Without tax effect accounting, the total super balance of each member would be overstated by $18,750 each, he explained.

“Therefore, clients and advisers may wish to consider tax effect accounting as a conservative approach to ensure they do not overstate members’ total superannuation balances,” he said.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Lawyer highlights impact of accounting methods on TSB
william fettes
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.