subscribe to our newsletter

Mid-tier warns on snares with business succession and SMSFs

Caution, warn, beware, business succession
Miranda Brownlee
01 February 2018 — 1 minute read

With integrational business transfers becoming less common, business owners are hitting roadblocks upon retirement, particularly where the bulk of their wealth is tied up in the business or an SMSF is involved, a mid-tier firm cautions.

Speaking at an event in Sydney, HLB Mann Judd partner Nicholas Guest said while many business owners may have plans to pass their business on to the next generation of the family, younger Australians in their 20s and 30s have less desire to take over family businesses than in the past.

“So these founders are then confronted with the question of what to do. They might have a large part of their wealth tied up in the business,” said Mr Guest.


One of the other challenges with selling the business, Mr Guest said, is that once the principal founder starts to exit the business, the value of the business tends to decline.

“It's not unusual for some businesses to start to lose one or two key customers or for other slight changes to occur which can quite quickly lead to a decline in the value of the business,” he warned.

“[This] makes it much more challenging to market the business and attract a buyer who’s willing to pay a premium for it.”

Business succession can become especially problematic where an SMSF owns assets in the business and there’s no structured way to bring in another management team, HLB Mann Judd managing partner Tony Fittler added.

“We saw one situation where one generation exited the business and they were paid out into an SMSF and that required more debt because it extracted a lot of capital out of the business. The business then has a downturn in trade and collapsed,” explained Mr Fittler.

“The SMSF owned real property that was occupied by the business so it then became a double collapse.”

Mr Guest said some business owners could achieve a better outcome by allowing plenty of time to plan for succession.

“Planning for these exits is absolutely critical. It’s a discussion that we try to commence as early as possible, with planning, individuals have much more opportunity,” he said.

“You'd like to think that a business owner can always have at their disposal the control around when they'll exit a business but unfortunately through an accident or ill health, sometimes these decisions are forced, and they find that they can no longer work in their business. If they haven't put in some place some kind of active succession plan, it can leave other members of their family left with quite a large financial burden.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Mid-tier warns on snares with business succession and SMSFs
caution 382
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.