Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Expats taking risks with residency rules, warns specialist adviser

Expats taking risks with residency rules, warns specialist adviser

Security, warning, residency rules, expats
Miranda Brownlee
29 January 2018 — 1 minute read

Expats with SMSFs who are pushing the boundaries with the residency rules have been warned that data-matching technology and other tools at the ATO’s disposal are making it easier than ever for the regulator to catch them out.

Atlas Wealth Management managing director Brett Evans, who specialises in advice for expats, said out of all the residency conditions for SMSFs, the central management and control requirement is the most challenging for expats as it is often difficult for SMSF members to fully relinquish control.

While on paper they may have a family member, an accountant or adviser as a power of attorney, they continue to try and control their SMSF from afar, he said.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Often people will say that their accountant has got a power of attorney or that their financial adviser is doing all the investments for them, but that’s still not enough control. It has to be overarching control of the account,” he explained.

“We saw a case where the sister, who was appointed as a director of a corporate trustee and held a power of attorney on behalf of her brother, had no idea about super, investing and everything else that goes along with it. If the ATO had done a spot audit and questioned her about her ability to manage the fund she would have failed in a heartbeat.”

Mr Evans said a lot of expats with SMSFs are also under the assumption that it will be very difficult for the regulator to catch them out.

“The most commonly used phrase is “how is the ATO going to know?”, but the regulator now has plenty of tools at its disposal including data-matching technology [to monitor this].

“If the ATO suspects something and they can see that its pretty easy money for them to get in terms of fines and tax compliance and that sort of thing, it’s amazing how much effort the regulator will go to in order to chase that money.”

If the client doesn’t have any physical assets such as property, collectibles or gold, then Mr Evans said in some cases it may be best to move the client to a retail super fund with flexible investment options.

“If the client just has direct equities and managed funds and still wants to have some sort of control over the investment making decisions, then it’s a pretty simple exercise just to wind up the SMSF and roll back to a retail super fund and build direct equity and managed fund portfolio inside the retail super fund,” he said.

“They can still have control over it but we don’t have the issues of active members and central management and control.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Expats taking risks with residency rules, warns specialist adviser
security
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do any of your clients have related party LRBAs?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.