subscribe to our newsletter

Lawyer pinpoints flaws in proposals for accessing criminal super

Lawyer pinpoints flaws in proposals for accessing criminal super
Miranda Brownlee
11 January 2018 — 1 minute read

If the government proceeds with the proposal to allow victims of crime to access a perpetrator’s superannuation, the process should be handled by a state compensation scheme, according to an industry lawyer.

Part of Treasury’s consultation into the early release of superannuation looks at whether victims of crime should be able to access a perpetrator’s superannuation for compensation.

DBA Lawyers special counsel Bryce Figot said one of the potential issues for victims of crime with this is that it has mostly been framed in the consultation paper as the victim being able to gain direct access to the perpetrator’s superannuation.


“If the [government] does it that way, then I think there would be a big disincentive for the victim to pursue this,” said Mr Figot.

“If someone has committed some awful crime against you, you probably want nothing to do with them, let alone pursuing them in some system for accessing their superannuation.”

A better option, Mr Figot explained, would be to enable state and territory compensation schemes to access a perpetrator’s superannuation to recover costs on behalf of the victim.

“The paper does point out that you do have various tribunals all around the country that will pay compensation to you and you don't necessarily have to deal with the perpetrator,” he said.

If victims were able to receive the money from a state compensation scheme that had access to the perpetrator’s super, Mr Figot said this would be a “far more feasible and practical”.

While there would certainly be an attraction in allowing victims of crime to access a perpetrator’s superannuation, he said, the government will also need to consider if they want criminals reaching retirement with nothing.

“If you take away all of their money, what do you think a violent criminal would do to get more money?” he noted.

“However, it's also very unfair that someone could be a criminal and commit some very violent crimes and have a large chunk of superannuation that their victims aren’t able to access.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Lawyer pinpoints flaws in proposals for accessing criminal super
magnifying glass 382 1
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.