subscribe to our newsletter

SMSFs warned on overlooked trap with trust deeds

SMSFs warned on overlooked trap with trust deeds
Miranda Brownlee
27 November 2017 — 2 minute read

Certain SMSF trust deeds that are silent on particular issues are resulting in inappropriate obligations and limitations being imposed on trustees, an industry lawyer has cautioned.

DBA Lawyers senior associate William Fettes said while SMSF practitioners and trustees are well aware that the trust deed provides the rules for the fund, what is often less understood is the fact that the trust vehicle forms the basis of the superannuation system, and therefore there can be general trustee duties applying that people are not aware of.

“It’s not just what your trust deed says, if it’s silent on particular issues, then there are certain presumptions that apply to trustees of trusts and superannuation funds including SMSFs,” he explained.


“They’re just a special type of trust that has certain tax rules applied, and has certain covenants and other things that are read in, but they are a trust, and because of that, there are general law duties that apply to the trustee, unless they’re excluded by the deed.”

Under tax law, for example, trustees generally have to invest the trust property as a prudent person would, or essentially as a prudent business person would, and they have to do that in the best financial interests of the beneficiaries.

“There’s an issue around what this means. It’s broadly construed the modern portfolio theory of investing, so having one major real estate investment would not be consistent with that for example,” he said.

“Even if you had an investment strategy that supported that, if your deed didn’t say that you’re allowed to have undiversified investments, these are still general obligations.”

There can also be other limitations in dealing with real estate, he said.

“If you’ve got a piece of real estate for example, the trustee has a duty to rent the property, it has to receive rents for it on an ongoing basis, it can’t be left untenanted,” he explained.

“We sometimes see land banking in superannuation, primarily in an SMSF context, whether that’s in the context of long-term capital gain appreciation, or some type of development that’s happening over a period of time, so there’s plenty of times where SMSFs don’t have the trust property tenanted and that wouldn’t be permitted if your trust deed was silent on it,” he warned.

There can also be limitations on carrying on a business and holding assets in the name of another entity other than the trustee, if the trust deed is silent on those issues.

“So this means that there are general trust law duties that we need to factor in,” he said.

“In most cases a well-drafted deed is going to displace those requirements and remove them from being applied in an SMSF context, because they’re not desirable or they don’t provide enough flexibility.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

SMSFs warned on overlooked trap with trust deeds
magnifying glass 382 1
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Are you in favour of abolishing the AFSL system?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.