subscribe to our newsletter

Reserves missing from super legislation, says consultant

Meeting, conference, super legislation, SMSFs
Miranda Brownlee
06 October 2017 — 1 minute read

In light of the ATO’s crackdown on reserves, an industry consultant has proposed a solution to address the regulator’s concerns about the use of reserves for circumventing new limits and restrictions.

Last month, the ATO announced it would be monitoring the use of reserves by SMSFs following the introduction of new limits and restrictions including the transfer balance cap and total super balance.

The ATO warned that any unexplained increases in the creation of new reserves or in the balances of existing reserves maintained by SMSFs was “likely to attract close scrutiny”.


Speaking in a webinar, SMSF Academy director Aaron Dunn said the use of reserves was one of the key aspects that the government failed to address when it drafted the legislation for the superannuation reforms.

“If we look back at what the government was trying to do, particularly around the objective of super, one of the things that was clearly missed was reserve amounts. Reserve amounts were not covered in any way, shape or form [in relation] to whether they could be used or applied in respect to a member’s total superannuation balance,” said Mr Dunn.

“Off the back off that we have seen individuals contemplating whether they can apply reserves inside an SMSF to try and keep an individual under certain thresholds.”

In order to eliminate concerns around individuals using these types of strategies, Mr Dunn said the government could look at introducing a requirement similar to what the Labor government did when introduced an additional cap for super funds with balances below $500,000.

“The Labor government, when they were looking at introducing the additional $25,000 cap for individuals that have balances under $500,000, they had a requirement in that bill that if there were reserves inside in the fund, then there was a proportionate allocation of those reserves based upon the member's balance,” he explained.

“That to me would nip this issue in the bud very quickly but in reality we exist in a landscape where we have clouds hanging over whether reserves can or can't be used.”

Mr Dunn said SMSF practitioners will need to tread carefully with reserves.

“Make sure that if you are running reserves that there is a purpose and you have those appropriately documented and correlating back to what the governing rules of the fund ordinarily say,” he said.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Reserves missing from super legislation, says consultant
meeting conference382
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.