As part of its submission in response to the ATO’s consultation on events-based reporting, the SMSF Association recently undertook a survey of its members.
The survey indicated that less than half of the respondents in the survey are currently ready for the ATO’s introduction of events-based reporting and that less than half are satisfied with the intended start time.
The results also showed that only half of the respondents understand the intent and what is required to satisfy the ATO’s event-based reporting.
“There is general concern about SMSF advisors’ ability to cope with the significant amount of changes in the superannuation environment and increased costs for clients driven by extra requirements,” the submission said.
The SMSF Association said it supported the second option suggested by the ATO in its position paper on events-based reporting, as this would allow for a smoother transition.
“Trustees and their advisers will have more time to ensure their reporting obligations are met after a relevant transfer balance cap has occurred,” said the submission.
The results from the member survey indicated that 90 per cent of members surveyed supported option 2 in the ATO’s position paper.
Under option 2, from 1 July 2018, SMSFs will have 28 days after the end of the relevant quarter to report all transfer balance cap events except commutation authorities and commutations after an excess transfer balance tax determination.
After an agreed upon transitional period, SMSFs will then be required to report all events monthly, the submission explained.
The SMSF Association through its submission also proposed that the ATO considers looking into the feasibility of amending the requirement for the proposed transitional period.
“For example, members with a total superannuation balance below $1 million could be carved out of reporting until 1 July 2020 (the end of quarterly transition period),” the submission said.
The SMSF Association said this would have the added benefits of reducing the compliance strain on SMSF trustees and advisers in the immediate future and also reduce any revenue leakage from SMSFs.
Over complicated ODwyer and her Canberra red tape junkies twisting the whole industry tighter and tighter into a complete mess.
But hey we have gold plated CSS Lifetime pensions so who cares about the rest of Superannuation
Yet more ridiculous confusion created by bureaucrats trying to turn the super industry inside out with excessive compliance which even they don.t understand fully.
The long term affects on the public’s’ confidence or lack of confidence in superannuation will speak for itself thanks to these buffoons making it unnecessarily too complicated and confusing.