subscribe to our newsletter

Risks flagged with software-generated pension documents

Exclamation point
Miranda Brownlee
08 September 2017 — 1 minute read

A technical expert has urged SMSF practitioners to review software-generated pension documents as some of these documents don’t align with the trust deed and could also increase the level of reporting required by the ATO.

Speaking in a podcast, SMSF Academy director Aaron Dunn said there has been a significant increase in the use of software-generated pension documents within the SMSF industry, with an estimated two-thirds of all SMSF practices using these documents.

While there may not be any issues with using these documents, Mr Dunn said it is vital that SMSF practitioners ensure these pension documents are lined up with the governing rules of the fund.


If the pension documents are not aligned with the governing rules of the fund, and the pension is not being paid in accordance with those rules, there is a risk the income stream could miss out on the pension exemption, he warned.

“The commissioner makes it very clear inside tax ruling TR 2013/5 that where a member fails to comply with the terms and conditions of the income stream, let alone the SIS regulations, then a pension would ordinarily fail,” Mr Dunn explained.

The way in which the pension documents have been drafted, he said, will also affect what strategies an SMSF is able to adopt.

“An example that has come to the fore in the past few years is the ability to alter the terms and conditions of that income stream without having any detrimental impact on entitlements that the individual might be able to receive,” he said.

“If we think about income streams that existed prior to 1 January 2015, it has been confirmed that if we add a reversionary beneficiary to a pre January 2015 pension, the grandfathering that is attached to that income stream from a Centrelink point of view will actually carry on. “

The only way to  make any alteration if this was not allowed under the terms and conditions imposed by the deed, he said would therefore be to "commute and repurchase" the pension, if for example, they wanted to add a reversionary beneficiary.


"That in itself is going to increase some of the reporting to the ATO [under events-based reporting] because we’re going to see commutations and repurchases and if we don’t complete that within the prescribed time frames once we get past the transitional period, there would of course be lots of administrative penalties around that as well,” he warned.

Mr Dunn said pension documentation is an area requiring far greater attention with the new superannuation reforms.

“I’d be encouraging you to go back and look at what the governing rules of the fund say, and how the documentation that you might be generating from your SMSF software correlates back to the deed, and if there’s any doubts with that, you may want to contemplate how you might need to tie that information back up together.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Risks flagged with software-generated pension documents
caution 382
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.