Proposed legislation providing additional powers to APRA and disclosure requirements released by ASIC will further increase costs for APRA-regulated funds in what is already a very competitive marketplace, says KPMG.
In a blog article, KPMG partner of superannuation advisory, Adam Gee said in late June ASIC released the report REP 529 Member Experience of Superannuation, which requires trustees of large APRA-regulated funds to place greater focus on the manner in which they disclose critical fund information to their members.
This was followed by Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer’s announcement of draft legislation aimed at improving member outcomes, which will incorporate significant new powers for APRA, said Mr Gee.
The proposed legislation, he said, provides additional powers to APRA to intervene at any earlier stage where it has prudential concerns surrounding the actions of a trustee.
“This is substantially different to the powers APRA has in relation to the superannuation industry and in line with their powers in relation to the banking and insurance industry,” he said.
“Either way, this should once again put trustees on notice and suggests that APRA will be far more intrusive in overseeing superannuation fund operations going forward.”
The government has also proposed annual member meetings for superannuation meetings, the cost of which, he predicts, will likely outweigh any benefits for the majority of funds.
In regards to ASIC Report 529, the regulator he said is placing greater focus on ensuring that funds’ disclosure within product disclosure statements, regular communications and fund websites is comprehensive and aligns with underlying fund policies and procedures.
“Additional detailed disclosure may provide further challenges for funds, particularly when, in many cases, it is difficult to get members to even read the existing raft of disclosure material already available,” he said.
While the additional powers for the regulators may improve overall member outcomes, he said, the measures proposed, such as annual member meetings, will require material additional work for funds to comply.
“This will potentially increase costs further in what is already a competitive marketplace, which operates in a cost constrained environment, where fees continue to remain in the sights of regulators and ongoing government reviews,” he noted.
“But ultimately super funds will have to comply with the increased regulation while not letting higher costs worsen member experience. That is the new paradigm.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 20 Sep 2017‘Execution only’ approach with SMSFs high-risk for accountantsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 20 Sep 2017Super saver scheme to benefit wealthy, says consultantBy Miranda Brownlee
- 19 Sep 2017Government rules out tax cut for family trustsBy Lara Bullock
- 19 Sep 2017Government likely to review licensing regime, consultant predictsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Sep 2017Sluggish wage growth ‘undermining super savings’By Lucy Dean
- 18 Sep 2017SMSFs facing weaker investment outlook, report revealsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ‘Execution only’ approach with SMSFs high-risk for accountants
An industry lawyer has warned the unlicensed accounting firms recently contacted by ASIC that justifying the provision of services without a...read more
- Super saver scheme to benefit wealthy, says consultant
One consultant expects that wealthy Australians will gain the most advantage from the First Home Super Saver Scheme while the overall take-u...read more
- Government likely to review licensing regime, consultant predicts
Given the ongoing cost and complexity of the licensing regime for accountants, one consultant believes the government may have to review and...read more
- view all