The tax office has outlined the approach it will be taking to penalties associated with the new events-based reporting regime, and has now officially released a new position paper which explores different time frames for reporting.
As the industry is now well aware, from 1 July 2018, SMSFs will be required to report those events which impact on a member’s transfer balance account on a real-time basis..
There has been significant contention about this regime, particularly given that reporting time frames for various events related to SMSFs are not necessarily consistent, or in line with APRA funds.
As reported earlier today and foreshadowed last week, the ATO has now released a position paper which explores options for reporting time frames that are more in line with what is workable in the SMSF sector.
One option includes starting with quarterly reporting before diving straight into monthly reporting requirements. There are exceptions, including compliance or non-compliance with a commutation authority that has been issued to an SMSF.
The other option is to report events occurring in relation to the transfer balance account 10 business days after the end of the month in which the relevant event occurs. There are also exceptions here, including with LRBAs, which will have an administrative concession allowing reporting of relevant repayment events 28 days after the end of the relevant quarter.
SMSF Adviser readers have expressed concerns about the penalties that could apply with this regime, which the ATO’s assistant commissioner Kasey Macfarlane spoke to.
Essentially, Ms Macfarlane told SMSF Adviser that her team won’t be actively pursuing opportunities to hit SMSF professionals with late lodgement penalties.
“There are late lodgement penalties that apply. I want to stress that the ATO’s focus leading up to and after the first of July 2018 is to support SMSFs and their advisers in being ready for this, and helping them do what they need to do to be able to report these events,” Ms Macfarlane said.
“In the 2018/19 year, we will be be taking a judicious approach to any late lodgement penalties.
“The greatest risk, from our perspective, of SMSFs not reporting on time is the risk to the individual member if they’ve inadvertently and unknowingly made an error, and face that unexpected or increasing tax liability.”
She also moved to quash speculation about potential penalties associated with this regime and exempt current pension income (ECPI.)
“There has been speculation that the ATO might seek to deny ECPI claims where an SMSF doesn’t report on time under this model,” she said. “I just want to state that the ATO doesn’t intend to do that.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 20 Sep 2017‘Execution only’ approach with SMSFs high-risk for accountantsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 20 Sep 2017Super saver scheme to benefit wealthy, says consultantBy Miranda Brownlee
- 19 Sep 2017Government rules out tax cut for family trustsBy Lara Bullock
- 19 Sep 2017Government likely to review licensing regime, consultant predictsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Sep 2017Sluggish wage growth ‘undermining super savings’By Lucy Dean
- 18 Sep 2017SMSFs facing weaker investment outlook, report revealsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ‘Execution only’ approach with SMSFs high-risk for accountants
An industry lawyer has warned the unlicensed accounting firms recently contacted by ASIC that justifying the provision of services without a...read more
- Super saver scheme to benefit wealthy, says consultant
One consultant expects that wealthy Australians will gain the most advantage from the First Home Super Saver Scheme while the overall take-u...read more
- Government likely to review licensing regime, consultant predicts
Given the ongoing cost and complexity of the licensing regime for accountants, one consultant believes the government may have to review and...read more
- view all