Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Reversionary TRISs at risk of serious breach, warns CFS

Reversionary TRISs at risk of serious breach, warns CFS

caution tape medium 345x216
Miranda Brownlee
09 August 2017 — 2 minute read

A technical trap in legislation released this year is placing SMSF trustees with reversionary TRISs at risk of either breaching the SIS death benefit cashing rules or facing adverse estate planning outcomes, warns a technical expert.

Colonial First State executive manager Craig Day said in late June the government introduced new rules to allow transition to retirement (TTR) pensions to convert to retirement phase where a member has satisfied a condition of release.

“Now those conditions of release were actually specified to only include [turning] age 65, as well as retirement, permanent incapacity, and terminal illness, but funnily enough, it didn't include death,” said Mr Day.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What this means, he said, is that where someone has a reversionary TTR pension, upon their death the beneficiary will need to be assessed in order to determine whether they satisfy one of those conditions of release.

The reason for this, he explained, is that the super reforms also amended the cashing rules for death benefits.

“What the cashing rules now say is that a death benefit can only be paid as a lump sum or as a pension that’s in retirement phase,” he said.

What normally happens is that a reversionary pension will continue on the death of the original member, but if the beneficiary hasn’t met one of those specified conditions of release this can’t occur as the TTR pension would not be in the retirement phase, he said.

“What this technically means is that the reversionary nomination would be invalid as the trustee would not be permitted to continue to pay the pension under the death benefit rules.”

In this case, the beneficiary may have the option of taking the death benefit as a lump sum or as a new retirement phase income stream, such as an account based pension, so it may not seem like a big deal, said Mr Day.

“However, what's really important to understand is that if the reversionary nomination fails, the fund's governing rules kick in to prescribe how the trustee must pay  the death benefit.”

For example, in this case the fund’s deed may grant the trustee the power to exercise their discretion in relation to the payment of the death benefit.

“Now if the person you nominated as a reversionary beneficiary also the surviving trustee, then that may be fine because they can then make the decision to pay the death benefit to themselves as an account based pension,” said Mr Day.

However, where the reversionary is not a trustee of the fund, the outcomes may not be as desirable he warned. In this case, the trustee could exercise their discretion to pay the death benefit to the member’s other SIS dependant beneficiaries.

It’s just like in the case of an invalid binding death benefit nomination, whoever is left in control of the fund is going to get to call the shots. And if that someone isn’t inclined to want to pay anything to the reversionary beneficiary, such as an adult child from a previous relationship, then all may not end well.

“So it will be really important for members with reversionary TTR income streams  to review their estate planning arrangements and to update them where required. This could include revoking a reversionary nomination and replacing it with a binding death benefit nomination where the person nominated as a reversionary hasn’t satisfied one of the specified conditions of release’.

However, Mr Day warned that SMSF trustees should seek legal advice to confirm this is possible under the fund’s governing rules. Alternatively, a member could just stop and restart their pension, however that would come with additional administrative hassle and cost.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Reversionary TRISs at risk of serious breach, warns CFS
caution tape medium 345x216
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.