While re-contributions have long been used for estate planning purposes, they could now be important for protecting against future taxes imposed by the government and evening up balances, says a technical expert.
Speaking at an industry event, Heffron SMSF Solutions head of customer Meg Heffron explained that re-contribution strategies, which involve converting money that’s always been taxable in super into non-concessional contributions that are tax-free, have become more attractive with the super reforms.
Traditionally, she said, this strategy has typically been used for estate planning purposes, so that an “adult child that pays tax can inherit a super balance that’s tax-free, rather than a super balance that’s taxable”.
However, Ms Heffron said this strategy could also be very important in protecting against future taxes imposed by the government.
“For the last 10 years, we’ve had the luxury of being able to think that super is tax-free eventually for everybody. I reckon that’ll change one day, it obviously didn’t change this time, but maybe in the next round of changes it will,” she said.
“My thinking is tax-free money is unlikely to be taxed, whereas taxable is more likely to be, so I see re-contributions as a bit of a future-proofing exercise.”
Re-contributions will also be very useful for making the most out of the $1.6 million transfer balance cap, she said.
“For example, if you had one member with $2 million who is 60, and another member who is also 60 but has a much lower balance, and let’s imagine you’ve got plenty of time to make contributions for member two, you’d look at that and decide that in the new world, it’s much better to even up those balances,” she explained.
“Otherwise, when member one eventually gets to the point where they’re taking a pension they’ll be over $1.6 million, and we’ve wasted member two’s $1.6 million.”
In this couple, Ms Heffron said the member with the larger balance could take a TRIS and re-contribute the money for the member with the smaller balance.
“If we don’t do anything, however, they’ll get to 65 in five years’ time, the two balances will still be very out of whack and about 25 per cent of the fund will have to stay in accumulation phase because it’ll be over the $1.6 million cap,” she said.
“If we did something as simple as start a TRIS with some or all of the larger member’s balance and re-contributed it for the person with the smaller balance, we end up with very little in accumulation phase.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- 17 Aug 2017Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 17 Aug 2017Qld succession law changes tipped to impact SMSFsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 16 Aug 2017Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tierBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilities
A lack of understanding around taxable and non-taxable components in super funds could be exposing SMSF clients to unnecessary tax liabiliti...read more
- Contributions triple in June quarter, survey shows
The average contribution amount from SMSF trustees tripled for the June 2017 quarter, with super members looking to maximise their contribut...read more
- Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reporting
With events-based reporting set to generate huge amounts of data, concerns have been raised about whether the ATO’s systems will be able t...read more
- view all