ATO responds to real-time reporting backlash
The ATO has defended its push towards events-based reporting and has highlighted some of the opportunities it presents including streamlining SMSF reporting requirements.
Speaking at an industry conference, ATO assistant commissioner Kasey Macfarlane noted that events-based reporting was a topic causing great divide in the SMSF industry and stressed that the new requirements were vital for minimising the taxation consequences for an individual where the transfer balance cap is exceeded.
“The proposed model that the ATO is talking about is purely in relation to events-based reporting of events that impact on an individual’s transfer balance account,” explained Ms Macfarlane.
“I want to be clear that it’s not about daily accounting by SMSFs, it’s not about daily calculation of earnings of member balances, its purely about the transfer balance account.”
She also reminded practitioners that SMSFs will only need to report something under this model if one of the members has an event that impacts their transfer balance account.
“So if an SMSF has members in any particular period that doesn’t have one of these events, then they don’t have to report anything to us,” she said.
Ms Macfarlane explained that the excess transfer balance tax will continue to accrue on an excess amount each day up until the time the ATO issues an excess transfer balance determination, so reporting events to the ATO sooner will help to minimise this.
“So the longer it takes for relevant information to be reported to the ATO about an individual’s transfer balance amount, the longer the period it is that the ATO doesn’t have visibility. We won’t know that someone is in excess and therefore we won’t be in a position to issue that excess transfer balance determination,” she explained.
“In the meantime, those earnings on that excess will be continuing to accrue, and the individual’s liability will be continuing to increase.”
Many SMSFs, she noted, may only have to report one transfer balance cap debit of credit in the life of their fund.
“For example, they commence an income stream, let it run, and that’s it. The only thing they’ll ever have to report under this model is the commencement of the income stream,” she said.
The broader superannuation industry, Ms Macfarlane said is becoming increasingly automated through electronic transactions, initiatives such as SuperStream and the transition to single touch payroll.
This increased automation she said is improving the real time visibility of superannuation guarantee obligations and payments and could also present some opportunities for the SMSF space.
“It presents some opportunities to streamline the regulatory SMSF reporting requirements and for SMSF members to have that real-time visibility of contributions that employers make on their behalf and to know how they’re tracking in terms of contributions caps. It also allows us to think about online reporting for SMSF auditors,” she said.
Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.
Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.