Where clients using the proportionate method have large capital losses and elect to use the CGT relief, paying the tax this year rather than deferring could result in adverse tax consequences, warns a technical expert.
Heffron SMSF Solutions head of customer Meg Heffron explained that clients who plan to apply the CGT relief might be looking at their actuarial percentage for 2016/17 and their likely actuarial percentage next year, and trying to decide whether to pay the tax this year or defer it.
“I've had a number of clients say to me 'look my actuarial percentage, it's 99 per cent, it's so little, I'm just going to pay the tax this year, because I can't be bothered maintaining the records’,” Ms Heffron told delegates at the Class Connect Conference.
While in many circumstances this may be fine, she said, if the client has large carried forward losses, this could negatively impact them in future years.
“The reason is, if you decide to pay the tax this year, it's not a notional gain anymore, it's a real gain and it'll use up those losses,” she said.
“For example, let’s say a client had large losses last year at July 2016 and no more gains this year because nothing was sold. If nothing else had happened you would expect to have carried forward losses at the end of the year of $500,000 exactly what you had at the beginning.”
If the actuarial percentage is 99 per cent, and the client decides to opt into the CGT relief, and they’ve got notional gains of $300,000 which are all of the accrued gains on assets that were held at 9 November 2016, it would be only a small amount of tax to pay, she said.
“[However], look what happens to those losses if we make that choice; we offset the full $300,000 in gains against the carried forward losses, which means we only get to carry forward $200,000 in the future,” she explained.
“That's because they effectively become real gains, it's just as if you actively sold all of those assets and made that gain. So you'll come down to $200,000 in carried forward losses.”
If the tax is paid now, said Ms Heffron, then the client won’t have to pay any more tax after their 2016/17 tax return, but the client won’t be able to hold onto the losses.
“If we deferred it then we do have a little bit more to pay. We've got gains of $200,000, where we've carried the notional gains amount forward, but look at how small it is, because we get to apply the actuarial percentage, we get to apply the two-thirds discount - we only have to carry forward that tiny little bit, which of course is trivial and we'll basically hang on to those losses,” she said.
“Capital losses have become handy now because lots of our clients who were thinking I'm never going to pay tax again in my super fund, they now have accumulation accounts, so carried forward capital losses have suddenly become things to hang on to at all costs.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 17 Aug 2017Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 17 Aug 2017Qld succession law changes tipped to impact SMSFsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 16 Aug 2017Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tierBy Staff Reporter
- 16 Aug 2017SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 15 Aug 2017SMSF auditor disqualified for misconductBy Staff Reporter
- 15 Aug 2017Class gains market share in financial year resultsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reporting
With events-based reporting set to generate huge amounts of data, concerns have been raised about whether the ATO’s systems will be able t...read more
- Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tier
Clients hoping to accumulate a superannuation balance of $1.6 million by age 65 will need to start taking full advantage of concessional con...read more
- SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reporting
A straw poll has revealed that the majority of SMSF firms currently feel their firm is not equipped to deal with the proposed events-based r...read more
- view all