The three-year bring-forward rule for non-concessional contributions has been labelled as an area of concern by the ATO, with the complexity of the transitional rules likely to lead to mistakes being made.
ATO assistant commissioner Alex Affleck said it is important for SMSF practitioners and trustees to realise that even if the bring-forward rule has already been triggered, the total super balance still needs to be tested for each year.
“When you work out what your non-concessional contributions cap for a financial year is, you need to test what your total super balance was immediately prior to the financial year you’re currently in,” explained Mr Affleck.
The total super balance, he said, will dictate what a member’s non-concessional contribution cap is for the financial year and whether they’re actually able to access the bring-forward rule.
“For example, if you had between $1.4 million and $1.6 million, your non-concessional contribution cap would be $200,000, and you’d have a bring-forward of two years,” he said.
“So you make a non-concessional contribution of $150,000 which triggers the rule. You then have $50,000 remaining for the next financial year. [However], if your total super balance immediately prior to that second year is equal to or above $1.6 million, then your non-concessional contribution cap is nil for that second year.”
Mr Affleck said there are transitional rules where a member has triggered the three-year bring-forward rule in either the 2015-16 year or the 2016-17 year and as part of that three-year bring-forward rule, they make non-concessional contributions after 1 July 2017.
“This is an area where we have some concerns in terms of whether this transitional rule will trip people up. We’re hoping that it won’t, but there is some risk here,” he said.
“It’s not an easy concept for people to get their heads around and it is something where we see a bit of risk in terms of people getting this wrong.”
Mr Affleck said there had been a number of cases of individuals getting the three-year bring-forward rule wrong, which has had “serious consequences for them”.
“We do see this as a bit of an issue, so I’d just like to stress that point,” he said.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 21 Aug 2016Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 21 Aug 2016Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all