Clients at the wealthier end of the scale should be aware of the nuances involved with commuting pensions back to accumulation phase to comply with the new super rules.
Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Colonial First State executive manager Craig Day gives the following case study of where complications may arise:
Take a client who has two account-based pensions for $1.6 million each. One is made up of 100 per cent tax-free component and the other is 100 per cent taxable component. Which one do you move back?
If the client isn’t concerned about the taxation of death benefits paid to adult kids, then it doesn’t matter. However, if they are, it’s an important decision as it could make a difference to the tax components and therefore tax that applies to any death benefits.
If you understand that in pension phase any growth will be allocated to tax-free and taxable components on a proportional basis based on the tax component proportions set at commencement, you may say it’s better to leave the pension made up entirely of tax-free component in the pension phase, as any growth will be allocated to tax-free component.
However, it’s a little more nuanced than that. We also have to take into account minimum drawdown percentages for account-based pensions, and the return on the pension account.
If the return on the pension account is likely to be less than minimum drawdown, you are not getting any growth. Meanwhile, your tax-free component is reducing, as it’s being paid as pension payments. In this case, you are actually better off leaving the pension made up of taxable component in pension phase and rolling back the tax-free pension to accumulation to preserve the tax-free component.
Alternatively, if the return on the pension account is higher than the minimum drawdown, you are better off with tax free in pension phase, as the growth will be allocated to the tax-free component which will then increase over time.
Obviously, the minimum drawdown starts low, but increases with age. Therefore, the best strategy of all may be starting off with the pension made up of tax-free component in the pension phase, and then commuting and swapping over at a latter age, maybe at 75 or 80, when minimums jump to 6 and 7 per cent respectively.
The other complication is the amount of income the client wants. If it’s more than the minimum and taken as pension payments, the decision is return dependant.
However, if the member is taking extra as lump sums, then it’s generally better to have tax free in pension phase.
Mr Day’s conclusion is that, effectively, there is no “rule of thumb” when it comes to working through these scenarios with your clients, and professionals should consider all associated variables before making a decision.
“All of a sudden now that the rubber is hitting the road in terms of the commutation requests coming through, advisers are now asking these questions … and clients want answers too,” he added.
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 08:00Lawyer challenges ATO view on two fund strategiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 08:00Risks flagged with real estate appraisal valuesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reportingBy Katarina Taurian
- 18 Aug 2017Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tierBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Tax component confusion spurs potential tax liabilitiesBy Miranda Brownlee
- 18 Aug 2017Contributions triple in June quarter, survey showsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- ATO locks in details, addresses panic on real-time reporting
The tax office has addressed several points of confusion with the new events-based reporting regime, locked in key deadlines, and outlined w...read more
- Data feeds unreliable for new reporting, says mid-tier
With an estimated 20 per cent of SMSFs still encountering errors from data feeds, one mid-tier firm believes the ATO should allow SMSF pract...read more
- view all