The SMSF Association has criticised the government’s proposed amendments for LRBAs and suggested alternative solutions, including a ban on related party borrowing.
At the beginning of this month, Treasury released an exposure draft detailing proposed changes for LRBAs aimed at overcoming situations where LRBAs are improperly used to circumvent the contribution caps.
In a submission to Treasury regarding the changes, the SMSF Association stated that it did not support these amendments as they will give rise to complex compliance requirements and prevent SMSFs from using LRBAs as a legitimate strategy for building retirement savings.
“We believe that the changes in their current form go beyond stopping this potential loophole in the total superannuation balance (TSB) restriction on non-concessional contributions (NCC) and instead effectively prevent SMSFs being able to undertake an LRBA after the amendments take effect,” SMSFA said in the submission.
“This is the effect because for the vast majority of LRBAs, an SMSF will require non-concessional contributions to be able to service the loan and by including the outstanding LRBA loan value in a person’s TSB, they are likely to be restricted from making further non-concessional contributions.”
The SMSF Association said that the LRBA amendments could instead be better targeted towards the elements required for defeating the policy intent of the TSB restriction on NCCs.
“We understand that it would be unlikely for an SMSF to execute the government’s targeted strategy through a retail lender,” the submission said.
“Retail lenders’ credit policies generally preclude older SMSF members from accessing funding for LRBAs due to their ability to make necessary contributions for repayment and also because the fund’s earnings are often required to pay pensions in retirement phase.”
The SMSF Association said the government could, therefore, restrict the proposed amendments to related party LRBAs or ban related party LRBAs from 1 July 2017 onwards so they cannot be used to exploit the TSB rules.
The submission also proposed restricting the amendments to people who have met a nil cashing restriction condition of release.
“By restricting the application of the proposed amendments to SMSF members who are able to actually use an LRBA to exploit the total superannuation balance NCC rules, this would avoid unfair outcomes for SMSF trustee who are using LRBAs in a legitimate fashion to build their retirement savings,” it said.
“We urge the government to reconsider the proposed LRBA amendments due to the complexity of the TBC amendments and the harsh effect of the TSB amendments on SMSFs intending to use an LRBA.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 08:00Critical disclosures flagged for US expat clientsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 23 Aug 2017'No apparent benefit' in ATO position on ECPIBy Katarina Taurian
- 23 Aug 2017Transfer balance cap confusion posing risks for practitionersBy Miranda Brownlee
- 23 Aug 2017TBAR reporting tipped to expose illegal adviceBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Aug 2017Contentious views on segregation locked inBy Katarina Taurian
- 22 Aug 2017Contributions spike for 2016-17 financial yearBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Transfer balance cap confusion posing risks for practitioners
Confusion around certain aspects of the transfer balance cap could be leading some practitioners to provide advice to clients based on premi...read more
- view all