The CGT relief is placing unlicensed accounting firms in a difficult position, with accountants only able to provide factual information in many cases but clients demanding clear answers, according to one financial services company.
While it is possible for unlicensed accountants to provide clients with an estimate of the tax result of different scenarios that could arise depending on how they choose to apply the relief, often the SMSF client is looking for a definite answer on what they should do, Merit Wealth accountants services director David Moss told SMSF Adviser.
“For an accountant that’s not licenced, they have to say, ‘Well here are the options – if you’re in a segregated super fund, you’ve got these choices; if you’re in an unsegregated super fund, then you can do this or that, or alternatively you cannot apply the relief at all,” he explained.
There are a range of other elements impacting on the decision or tax outcome in addition to this, he said, including how much the client has in the super fund, whether the CGT relief is to be applied for a TRIS, if they plan to enter pension mode soon, or when they plan to sell certain assets or investments.
“If an accountant lays out all those different options to the client, some clients may say, ‘Thanks very much, I’ll make up my own mind based on the information’, but most clients don’t go to an accountant to be told, ‘Here are the options – go and work it out’,” he said.
“Most clients just need someone to tell them what to do. They just want to trust someone, and they just want to follow instructions.”
Simply providing factual information on the CGT relief, Mr Moss said, could therefore jeopardise the relationship the accountant has with their client.
At the same time, Mr Moss said providing advice in this area is very complicated and the accounting firm could be exposed to compliance risks by doing so.
“If you give the client wrong advice on this CGT relief, you’re then exposed, and it’s so complicated that it is easy for people to get this wrong,” he said.
Mr Moss said it’s very important that unlicenced accountants tread carefully in this area and consider getting a second opinion on any advice they plan to give the client.
“I myself would not go to the client with an answer without bouncing it off someone else because it’s just too complicated and error may cost a lot of money for someone, and it’s all happening at the same time as these licensing changes,” he said.
“So clients could get the wrong advice, lose a lot of money, while ASIC is out there looking for unlicenced accountants providing illegal advice.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 23 Aug 2017'No apparent benefit' in ATO position on ECPIBy Katarina Taurian
- 23 Aug 2017Transfer balance cap confusion posing risks for practitionersBy Miranda Brownlee
- 23 Aug 2017TBAR reporting tipped to expose illegal adviceBy Miranda Brownlee
- 22 Aug 2017Contentious views on segregation locked inBy Katarina Taurian
- 22 Aug 2017Contributions spike for 2016-17 financial yearBy Staff Reporter
- 22 Aug 2017ATO targeting illegal retirement schemesBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Transfer balance cap confusion posing risks for practitioners
Confusion around certain aspects of the transfer balance cap could be leading some practitioners to provide advice to clients based on premi...read more
- view all