Login
SMSFs cautioned on multiple pension consolidation
SMSF trustees with multiple pension accounts will need to closely consider their approach to complying with the transfer balance cap, as merging all the accounts into one may have negative outcomes in some cases, warns an industry lawyer.
Townsends Business & Corporate Lawyers special counsel Michael Hallinan says some SMSF trustees hold multiple pension accounts either within the one fund or across many funds.
SMSF practitioners will need to look at the details of these pension accounts in order to determine the best approach to meeting the transfer balance cap restrictions, where the combined individual amounts are in excess of $1.6 million, he said.
“One solution is to merge all of the pension accounts into the one pension account before 30 June 2017,” Mr Hallinan said.
“That is a solution but it does come at quite a hefty cost. If you’ve undertaken multiple pensions, then generally the reason you’ve done that is for the purposes of creating favourable tax-free amounts.”
Consolidating all of these pension accounts may, therefore, reduce the tax effectiveness of the original strategy.
“So think carefully about implementing a multiple consolidation strategy,” Mr Hallinan said.
The other strategy that trustees can use to meet the cap is to commute one or two of these separate pension accounts in order to meet the cap restrictions.
Mr Hallinan said this will involve deciding which pension account to partially or completely commute back into the accumulation.
“The pensions with the highest taxable component should be commuted first and then you work your way down the list.”
Miranda Brownlee
Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.
Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates.
Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.
would it be because if you want to withdraw extra from the fund, would come from accumulation account - and running down the higher taxable balances would be beneficial for estate planning?0- On accumulation accounts, growth in the fund counts towards the taxable component, even though the original amount may have been tax free. It's a sneaky tax.0
- This is the second article I've read which has suggested the same. I'm also perplexed!0
- I'm curious about Michael's last comment. Why would it be best to commute a pension with the highest taxable component rather than the opposite?0
Subscribe to the
BULLETIN
Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning
Subscribe
