In light of the revised transfer balance cap and changes to contribution caps, SMSF practitioners will need to reassess whether their clients’ insurance remain appropriate.
Australian Executor Trustees senior technical manager Julie Steed says following the changes to super, SMSFs with larger balances may want to reduce the amount of insurance they hold in their fund.
“No one will want $1 million worth of insurance in super if they’ve got larger account balances,” she said.
Ms Steed said SMSF practitioners will need to look for “simple opportunities” like investment bonds outside of super instead.
“[Assets like this] will pass through very quickly and easily through to beneficiaries or legal representatives who distribute benefits through the trust estate and that will be very important for people.”
SUBSCRIBE TO THE SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN
- 17 Aug 2017Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 17 Aug 2017Qld succession law changes tipped to impact SMSFsBy Miranda Brownlee
- 16 Aug 2017Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tierBy Staff Reporter
- 16 Aug 2017SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reportingBy Miranda Brownlee
- 15 Aug 2017SMSF auditor disqualified for misconductBy Staff Reporter
- 15 Aug 2017Class gains market share in financial year resultsBy Staff Reporter
- view all
- Industry questions ATO’s capacity for new reporting
With events-based reporting set to generate huge amounts of data, concerns have been raised about whether the ATO’s systems will be able t...read more
- Contribution limits restricting future balances, warns mid-tier
Clients hoping to accumulate a superannuation balance of $1.6 million by age 65 will need to start taking full advantage of concessional con...read more
- SMSF firms underprepared for events-based reporting
A straw poll has revealed that the majority of SMSF firms currently feel their firm is not equipped to deal with the proposed events-based r...read more
- view all