Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter
Defined benefit pensions ‘a sleeper issue’

Defined benefit pensions ‘a sleeper issue’

pension annuity
Miranda Brownlee
22 December 2016 — 1 minute read

Technical experts, including PwC, fear many SMSF trustees who also have defined benefit pensions are confused about how these pensions will impact upon their $1.6 million cap, or are even entirely unaware of their impact.

SuperConcepts executive manager of SMSF technical and private wealth Graeme Colley told SMSF Adviser there is a reasonable number of people who have previously worked in positions such as ambulance officers or teachers and are confused about how these defined benefit pensions will be impacted by the caps.

“It may only be a small amount but it does impact upon the balance caps. So those people that have been in those types of funds need to be aware that will be taken into account in relation to the valuation of the $1.6 million cap,” said Mr Colley.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“Many of them do understand that but I think it’s a little bit of a sleeper for some people, who may have been a public servant for a short time many years ago and have still got some benefits in a public sector superannuation fund or maybe one of the big corporate funds.”

Those SMSF trustees need to understand the way in which those pensions are valued under the new rules is different from account-based pensions, he said. 

PwC director of private clients Liz Westover has also seen a lot of confusion around defined benefit income streams and how they are dealt with under the transfer balance cap or the pension caps.

Ms Westover said understanding how defined benefit pensions interact with other sorts of funds is particularly difficult.

“For example, we’ve got clients who have defined benefit funds and SMSFs, and constitutionally protected funds,” she said.

Some clients might have a combination of two or three of those particular types of funds and may be receiving income streams from all of them, she said, so determining how they all interact together to come up with the right outcome in compliance with the law for these clients can be a complex process.

“A lot of them are easy to deal with in isolation, but when you’re trying to combine a number of them, it means actually crunching through the numbers and getting clients to understand it,” she said.

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Defined benefit pensions ‘a sleeper issue’
pension annuity
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do any of your clients have related party LRBAs?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.