subscribe to our newsletter

End of financial year posing ‘real danger’ for SMSF trustees

Miranda Brownlee
23 December 2016 — 1 minute read

With a large number of accounting firms either unlicensed or new to licensing, there is a significant risk that many SMSF trustees could be caught out by the new super rules and left facing large penalties, cautions one financial services firm.

Speaking to SMSF Adviser, Merit Wealth accountants services director David Moss said almost every client with an SMSF will need a conversation from either an accountant or financial planner.

Mr Moss said financial planners have historically had regular conversations with their clients and while many accountants do as well, this can depend on whether they have the time to have these discussions with clients and whether they are licensed.


“If the client just posts their tax and accounting work then the accountant might not actually have the time or the opportunity to sit down and go through this stuff with the client,” said Mr Moss.

“There is a real danger for 30 June 2017, because if there is a client out there who gets caught out by these rules and no one helps them; no one makes them aware of the issues, they could find themselves in a really messy situation.”

If an SMSF trustee has $2 million in super and they’re in pension mode at the moment and don’t do anything until they get halfway through 2017, then they could be looking at a large sum of penalty tax for not having fixed that up, said Mr Moss.

While most SMSF trustees would have initially received advice on setting their pension up in the first place, it might have been 10 years ago when the accountants exemption still applied, said Mr Moss.

Allens partner Michelle Levy said failing to flag the recent superannuation changes with clients could also place accounting firms at risk of legal action further down the track if the client is adversely affected.

This means firms will need to ensure they either advise clients on the recent changes, she said, or if they’re unlicensed, refer them to a firm that can.

“So if an accountant failed to tell their client that they had a window in which to do something based on the recent [superannuation legislation], there would be a good argument that they were negligent,” she warned.

“For example, there is currently an opportunity for the client to potentially put more into super before the new caps are introduced.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee


Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

End of financial year posing ‘real danger’ for SMSF trustees
smsfadviser logo

Are you up to date with the legislative changes from 1 July? Contribution cap increases, super guarantees, age increases, SG rate increases. The budget announcement changes. Don’t be caught off guard by your clients’ questions. Prepare for any scenario with the SMSF Foundations course. 21 CPD hours available. Learn more

join the discussion

Latest poll

Do you have clients that are aged 65 or 66 planning to trigger the bring forward rules?


Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.