You have4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
You have 4 free articles left this month.
Register for a free account to access unlimited free content.
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
lawyers weekly logo
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

ATO ramps up focus on dodgy contributions

news
By Katarina Taurian
November 21 2016
1 minute read
2 View Comments
ATO ramps up focus on dodgy contributions
expand image

The tax office has found increasing incidences of SMSF members deliberately over-contributing in an attempt to reduce their tax bill, and has warned that members could be potentially triggering the anti-avoidance rules.

ATO assistant commissioner Kasey Macfarlane says the ATO is concerned by an increasing number of cases of super members deliberately exceeding their non-concessional caps.

It appears that members are using the refunds of excess non-concessional contributions to reduce the taxable components of their benefits.

 
 

“There appears to be no reason why a super member would do so other than to generate the potential downstream tax benefit that arises when their super benefit is eventually paid,” Ms Macfarlane told delegates at the SMSF Adviser Technical Strategy Day in Sydney.

Ms Macfarlane warned of the possible application of Pt IVA of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 and the general anti-avoidance rules in those particular arrangements.

“This is something the ATO is concerned about, in particular there seems to be no reason a member would undertake that strategy other than to generate those potential downstream tax benefits when their super benefits are eventually paid,” she said.

You need to be a member to post comments. Become a member for free today!

Comments (2)

  • avatar
    This sounds like the issue I warned about in my submission on the exposure draft of what became the Tax and Superannuation Laws Amendment (2014 Measures No. 7) Act 2015. The withdrawals aren't required to come from the superannuation interest that received the contribution.

    Does the ATO's position on Part IVA in this situation have implications for re-contribution strategies?

    0
  • avatar
    My understanding of part IVA was that it had to be that tax was the sole and and primary purpose of the transaction for the benefit of the TAXPAYER. As the beneficiary of such action will be the beneficiaries of the taxpayer and the taxpayer making the contribution then can part IVA be applied at all? Would appreciate comments.
    0
avatar
Attach images by dragging & dropping or by selecting them.
The maximum file size for uploads is 10MB. Only gif,jpg,png files are allowed.
 
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
The maximum number of 3 allowed files to upload has been reached. If you want to upload more files you have to delete one of the existing uploaded files first.
Posting as