Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
subscribe to our newsletter

Actuarial certificate requirements in line for significant shake-up

Miranda Brownlee
11 November 2016 — 1 minute read

A paragraph in memorandum material released on Wednesday specifies that under the new proposed superannuation laws, unsegregated super funds will no longer need to obtain actuarial certificates for certain account-based pensions, according to SuperConcepts.

SuperConcepts general manager of technical services and education Peter Burgess says while the industry will have to wait until the final regulations to know for certain, a paragraph in the explanatory memorandum for the superannuation reforms suggests this may be the case.

Mr Burgess said paragraph 3.337 of the explanatory memorandum for the Superannuation (Excess Transfer Balance Tax) Imposition Bill 2016 states:

Advertisement
Advertisement

“A regulation will be made for the purposes of subsection 295 390(7) to determine liabilities in respect of account-based income stream benefits for the proportionate method. This means that superannuation funds who use the proportionate method but whose only superannuation income stream benefit liabilities arise from account-based superannuation income stream products will also not be required to obtain an actuary’s certificate for the purpose of determining their exempt current pension income.”

Under current law, Mr Burgess said that if a super fund is unsegregated, they do need to obtain an actuarial certificate to determine what portion of the fund’s earnings are exempt from tax.

“From what we can see, and I’ll stress that we do need to see the regulations, it looks as if funds won’t require an actuarial certificate if they’ve got an account-based pension, even if they’re unsegregated,” he said.

One of the big drivers for this is the fact that from 1 July 2017, SMSFs with pension balances in excess of 1.6 million won’t be able to use the segregated approach by claiming exempt current pension income.

“With that change under the previous drafts you could have a situation where the fund was totally in the pension phase, but still required to use an actuarial certificate which was quite a bizarre outcome,” Mr Burgess said.

“So not needing to get an actuarial certificate would address that situation so it may help to facilitate SMSFs wanting to segregate their assets by having more than one fund.”

Miranda Brownlee

Miranda Brownlee

 

Miranda Brownlee is the deputy editor of SMSF Adviser, which is the leading source of news, strategy and educational content for professionals working in the SMSF sector.

Since joining the team in 2014, Miranda has been responsible for breaking some of the biggest superannuation stories in Australia, and has reported extensively on technical strategy and legislative updates. Miranda has also directed SMSF Adviser's print publication for several years. 

Miranda also has broad business and financial services reporting experience, having written for titles including Investor Daily, ifa and Accountants Daily.

You can email Miranda on: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Actuarial certificate requirements in line for significant shake-up
smsf logo
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Latest poll

What is the best solution to improve access to SMSF advice?

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.