subscribe to our newsletter
Government considers national default for super scheme

Government considers national default for super scheme

Jack Derwin
22 September 2016

The federal government is considering the idea of having super funds compete to be the national default provider as part of a measure to cut fees.

According to the plan detailed by the Productivity Commission, super funds would engage in a bidding war, with the provider with the lowest fees awarded a national tender.

Under the plan, new employees would be placed in a single default fund instead of an employer-nominated one.

If the plan was to go ahead, a national tender could be awarded every two years, as is the case in other countries.

According to the Grattan Institute, if such a system was established in Australia it could save over $1 billion in fees per year.

The proposal was inspired by a similar system functioning in Chile, where the national tender is awarded every two years and has resulted in significant fee savings.

According to the Grattan Institute, the initial tender in Chile slashed fees by 20 per cent when it was awarded in 2008, with the current one charging 65 per cent less than under the old system.

The Productivity Commission says those already in employer selected default funds under the current system would not be obliged to switch to the national default if introduced, but would have the option available to them if they so chose. 

Government considers national default for super scheme
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

Do your clients plan to add additional members to their SMSF if the new six member limit is passed as law?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super