subscribe to our newsletter
Insurance dispute highlights trap with SMSF advice

Insurance dispute highlights trap with SMSF advice

Miranda Brownlee
29 August 2016

FOS has reminded SMSF practitioners to carefully review their clients’ insurance arrangements in relation to super, after one practitioner ended up paying compensation to a client over an insurance dispute.

FOS ombudsman Allison Maynard says the failure to consider insurance before setting up an SMSF and transferring funds is one of the common disputes the organisation sees with SMSF advice.

Ms Maynard told SMSF Adviser in one dispute matter, an adviser had told a couple to set up an SMSF, and while the adviser was aware of the need to arrange alternative insurances, they had moved the client’s superannuation across before the insurances were in place.

“Those consumers ended up with insurance policies with higher premiums and with exclusions that their previous policies didn’t have,” she said.

“The clients ended up getting compensated for that [by the practitioner].”

Ms Maynard said in situations where clients are in their 50s or have health conditions, it is especially important for SMSF practitioners to look at the insurances held by the client with their existing superannuation.

“Clients may not be able to get the equivalent insurance so there needs to be attention paid to insurance issues,” she said.

Insurance dispute highlights trap with SMSF advice
smsfadviser logo
join the discussion

What do you plan to do in response to the new adviser education standards?

SUBSCRIBE TO THE
SMSF ADVISER BULLETIN

Get the latest news and opinions delivered to your inbox each morning

In this month's issue:

  • Time wrap
  • The tech bull run
  • From hobby to passion
  • Golden Years
  • An untimely reminder
  • Why change is so difficult
  • Key Strategies for equalising super